• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral and Brain Sciences >Strong reciprocity is real, but there is no evidence that uncoordinated costly punishment sustains cooperation in the wild
【24h】

Strong reciprocity is real, but there is no evidence that uncoordinated costly punishment sustains cooperation in the wild

机译：互惠互利是真实的，但没有证据表明不协调的代价高昂的惩罚会在野外维持合作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

I argue in my target article that field evidence does not support the costly punishment hypothesis. Some commentators object to my reading of the evidence, while others agree that evidence in favour of costly punishment is scant. Most importantly, no rigorous measurement of cost-benefit ratios in the field has been attempted so far. This lack of evidence does not rule out costly punishment as a cause of human cooperation, but it does pre-empt some overconfident claims made in the past. Other commentators have interpreted my article as an anti-experimental pamphlet or as a flat denial of the existence of pro-social motives - which it was not intended to be. While we have enough data to establish the existence (and theoretical relevance) of strong reciprocity motives, I argue in this response that their efficacy (and policy relevance) has not been demonstrated.
机译：我在我的目标文章中认为，现场证据不支持代价高昂的惩罚假设。一些评论员反对我阅读证据，而另一些评论家则认为支持代价高昂的惩罚的证据很少。最重要的是，迄今为止，尚未尝试过对该领域的成本效益比进行严格的测量。缺乏证据并不排除代价高昂的惩罚是人类合作的原因，但它确实可以避免过去提出的一些过分自信的主张。其他评论员将我的文章解释为反实验的小册子，或者是对否定亲社会动机的一概否认，而这本来不是本意。尽管我们有足够的数据来确定强互惠动机的存在（和理论相关性），但我在此回应中认为，尚未证明它们的有效性（和政策相关性）。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Behavioral and Brain Sciences》 |2012年第1期|p.45-51|共7页
  • 作者

    Francesco Guala;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Economics, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号