Open Peer Commentary You can't get there from here:Foundationalism and development

Jedediah W. P. Allen; Mark H. Bickhard

首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral and Brain Sciences >Open Peer Commentary You can't get there from here:Foundationalism and development

【24h】

Open Peer Commentary You can't get there from here:Foundationalism and development

机译：公开同行评论您不能从这里到达：基础主义与发展

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The thesis of our commentary is that the framework used to address what are taken by Carey to be the open issues is highly problematic. The presumed necessity of an innate stock of representational primitives fails to account for the emergence of representation out of a nonrepresentational base. This failure manifests itself in problematic ways throughout Carey's book.

机译：我们评论的主题是，用来解决凯里认为未解决问题的框架存在很大问题。假定必须有代表性的原始图元，这不能解释非代表性基础中代表性的出现。在凯里的书中，这种失败以有问题的方式表现出来。

著录项

来源
《Behavioral and Brain Sciences》 |2011年第3期|p.124-125|共2页
作者
Jedediah W. P. Allen; Mark H. Bickhard;
展开▼
作者单位

Departments of Psychology Lehigh University, Bethlehem,PA 18015;

Philosophy Lehigh University, Bethlehem,PA 18015;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. The Limits to Setting Limits on Critical-Care Delivery: Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Balancing Legitimate Critical-Care Interests: Setting Defensible Care Limits Through Policy Development" [J] . Kirby Jeffrey American journal of bioethics . 2016,第1期

机译：设置重症监护界限的极限：对“平衡合法重症监护利益：通过政策制定设定可辩护界限”的公开同行评论的回应
2. Towards the Development of Objective, Universal Criteria of Cultural Evaluation: The Challenges Posed by Anti-Foundationalism, Culturalism and Romanticism [J] . Matthew Thomas Johnson Social Indicators Research . 2005,第1a3期

机译：走向客观，通用的文化评价标准的发展：反基础主义，文化主义和浪漫主义的挑战
3. The science of peer support as applied to behavioral medicine and the care of individuals surviving with cancer: a commentary on “Peer mentors delivering a physical activity intervention for cancer survivors: effects among mentors by Pinto et al.” [J] . Christine Rini, Kristi D Graves, Suzanne C O’Neill, Translational behavioral medicine. . 2018,第6期

机译：对行为医学的同伴支持的科学与癌症幸存的人的关怀：对癌症幸存者的身体活动干预的同行导师的评论：Pinto等人的媒介作用。“
4. A Qualitative Analysis of Sub-degree Students Commentary Styles and Patterns in the Context of Gender and Peer e-Feedback [C] . Kat Leung, Manhoe Chan, Gordon Maxwell, Hybrid learning . 2010

机译：性别和同伴电子反馈背景下副学位学生评论风格和模式的定性分析
5. A Case Study of Peer Assessment in a MOOC-Based Composition Course: Students' Perceptions, Peers' Grading Scores versus Instructors' Grading Scores, and Peers' Commentary versus Instructors' Commentary [D] . Vu, Lan Thi. 2017

机译：在基于MooC的成分课程中对同伴评估的案例研究：学生的看法，同行评分分数与教练分级得分，以及同行评论与教练评论
6. Commentary: Developmental connectomics to advance our understanding of typical and atypical brain development – Commentary on [O] . Alice M. Graham, Damien A. Fair -1

机译：评论：发展性联结学可以增进我们对典型和非典型大脑发育的理解–
7. LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT, READING COMPREHENSION AND IDIOM COMREHENSION TRILOGY: PEER COMMENTARY ON LEVORATO ET [O] . Huseyin UYSAL 2015

机译：语言发展，阅读理解和识别商业三语：对LEVORaTO ET的同等评论

Open Peer Commentary You can't get there from here:Foundationalism and development

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅