首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral and Brain Sciences >Is everyone Bayes? On the testable implications of Bayesian Fundamentalism
【24h】

Is everyone Bayes? On the testable implications of Bayesian Fundamentalism

机译:每个人都是贝叶斯吗?关于贝叶斯原教旨主义的可检验含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A central claim of Jones & Love's (J&L's) article is that Bayesian Fundamentalism is empirically unconstrained. Unless constraints are placed on prior beliefs, likelihood, and utility functions, all behaviour - it is proposed -is consistent with Bayesian rationality. Although such claims are commonplace, their basis is rarely justified. We fill this gap by sketching a proof, and we discuss possible solutions that would make Bayesian approaches empirically interesting.
机译:琼斯和洛夫(J&L)文章的主要主张是,贝叶斯原教旨主义在经验上不受限制。除非对先验信念,可能性和效用函数施加限制,否则所有行为(建议的行为)都符合贝叶斯理性。尽管这种主张是司空见惯的,但其依据却很少。我们通过草绘证明来填补这一空白,并讨论可能使贝叶斯方法在经验上变得有趣的解决方案。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Behavioral and Brain Sciences》 |2011年第4期|p.213-214|共2页
  • 作者单位

    Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London,London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom;

    rnDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London,London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号