首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral and Brain Sciences >Problems with the imprinting hypothesis of schizophrenia and autism
【24h】

Problems with the imprinting hypothesis of schizophrenia and autism

机译:精神分裂症和自闭症的烙印假设存在问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Crespi & Badcock (C&B) convincingly argue that autism and schizophrenia are diametric malfunctions of the social brain, but their core imprinting hypothesis is less persuasive. Much of the evidence they cite is unrelated to their hypothesis, is selective, or is overstated; their hypothesis lacks a clearly explained mechanism; and it is unclear how their explanation fits in with known aspects of the disorders.
机译:Crespi&Badcock(C&B)令人信服地认为,自闭症和精神分裂症是社交大脑的直径失调,但其核心烙印假设却缺乏说服力。他们引用的许多证据与他们的假设无关,具有选择性或被夸大了。他们的假设缺乏明确解释的机制;目前尚不清楚他们的解释如何与疾病的已知方面相吻合。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Behavioral and Brain Sciences》 |2008年第3期|p.273-274|共2页
  • 作者

    Matthew C. Keller;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Psychology and Institute for Behavioral Genetics, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号