首页> 外文期刊>Berkeley technology law journal >Communications Privacy in the Military
【24h】

Communications Privacy in the Military

机译:军事通讯隐私

获取原文
           

摘要

It remains to be seen whether the CAAF's next communications privacy case will follow the reasoning in Larson, or return to the pte-Larson pattern of distinguishing work-related searches from those of law enforcement. It also remains to be seen whether the CAAF will entertain a constitutional challenge to the DoD's new Banner and User Agreement policy and, if so, will find it an appropriate exercise of executive authority. I have argued that the policy unnecessarily violates constitutional protections by expanding the DoD's search authority from mere systems monitoring, which is clearly work-related, to law enforcement, which the Supreme Court distinguished in O'Connor.
机译:CAAF的下一个通信隐私案是否会遵循Larson的推理,还是返回到区分工作相关搜索与执法搜索的pte-Larson模式,还有待观察。 CAAF是否会对国防部新的横幅和用户协议政策进行宪法挑战还有待观察,如果是的话,CAAF是否会适当行使行政权力。我认为,该政策不必要地违反了宪法保护,因为它将国防部的搜索权限从单纯的与工作有关的系统监控扩展到执法,而最高法院在奥康纳区对执法进行了区分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号