首页> 外文期刊>Berkeley technology law journal >BMG CANADA, INC. V. DOE & SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS & MUSIC PUBLISHERS OF CANADA V. CANADIAN ASS'N OF INTERNET PROVIDERS: WHY THE CANADIAN MUSIC COMPENSATION SYSTEM MAY NOT WORK IN THE UNITED STATES
【24h】

BMG CANADA, INC. V. DOE & SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS & MUSIC PUBLISHERS OF CANADA V. CANADIAN ASS'N OF INTERNET PROVIDERS: WHY THE CANADIAN MUSIC COMPENSATION SYSTEM MAY NOT WORK IN THE UNITED STATES

机译:BMG CANADA,INC。V. DOE与加拿大作曲家,作者和音乐出版商协会V. CANADAIAN的互联网供应商:为什么加拿大的音乐补偿系统可能在美国不起作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Canada and the United States rely on similar copyright schemes. When it comes to crafting and enforcing copyright law for and on the Internet, however, the solutions and outcomes in the two countries significantly differ. Recent Canadian court decisions BMG Canada, Inc. v. Doe ("Doe") and Society of Composers, Authors & Music Publishers of Canada v. Canadian Ass 'n of Internet Providers ("SOCAN") confirm that in Canada, copying or downloading music from the Internet for personal noncommercial use does not constitute infringement. Consequently, Internet service providers (ISPs) are not liable for contributory infringement or related royalty payments. In light of the marked departure these cases represent from U.S. law and norms, and larger problems with Canada's levy-based copyright regime, Doe and SOCAN demonstrate that it may not be feasible or desirable to adopt recent suggestions that the United States implement a Canadian-style system.
机译:加拿大和美国依赖类似的版权计划。但是,在制定和实施互联网上的版权法和在互联网上实施版权法时,两国的解决方案和结果存在很大差异。加拿大最近的法院判决BMG Canada,Inc.诉Doe(“ Doe”)以及加拿大作曲家,作家和音乐出版商协会诉Internet Providers的加拿大协会(SOCAN)确认在加拿大复制或下载互联网上用于个人非商业用途的音乐不构成侵权。因此,Internet服务提供商(ISP)不应对共同侵权或相关的特许权使用费负责。鉴于这些案件明显背离了美国法律和规范,并且加拿大的基于征费的版权制度存在更大的问题,Doe和SOCAN证明,采纳最近的建议,即美国实施加拿大的-样式系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号