...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Biology and Philosophy >Whither adaptation?
【24h】

Whither adaptation?

机译：还可以适应吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The two authors of this paper have diametrically opposed views of the prevalence and strength of adaptation in nature. Hendry believes that adaptation can be seen almost everywhere and that evidence for it is overwhelming and ubiquitous. Gonzalez believes that adaptation is uncommon and that evidence for it is ambiguous at best. Neither author is certifiable to the knowledge of the other, leaving each to wonder where the other has his head buried. Extensive argument has revealed that each author thinks his own view is amply supported by both theory and empirical evidence. Further reflection has revealed that the differences in opinion may start with the different disciplines in which we work: evolutionary ecology for Hendry and community ecology for Gonzalez. In the present paper, we each present devastating evidence supporting our own position and thus refuting that of the other. We then identify the critical differences that led to such opposing views. We close by combining our two perspectives into a common framework based on the adaptive landscape, and thereby suggest means by which to assess the prevalence and strength of adaptation.
机译：本文的两位作者对自然界中适应的普遍性和强度有着截然相反的看法。亨德利认为适应几乎可以在任何地方看到，并且它的证据是压倒性的和普遍存在的。冈萨雷斯认为适应并不常见，而充其量的证据充其量也是模棱两可的。两位作者都不了解对方的知识，而使每个人都想知道对方的头埋在哪里。广泛的争论表明，每个作者都认为自己的观点得到了理论和经验证据的充分支持。进一步的反思表明，意见分歧可能始于我们工作的不同学科：亨德利的进化生态学和冈萨雷斯的社区生态学。在本文中，我们每个人都提供破坏性的证据来支持我们自己的立场，因此驳斥了对方的立场。然后，我们确定导致这种相反观点的关键差异。最后，我们将两种观点结合成一个基于适应性景观的通用框架，从而提出评估适应性流行和强度的手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号