...
首页> 外文期刊>Biomass & bioenergy >Inherent hazards, poor reporting and limited learning in the solid biomass energy sector: A case study of a wheel loader igniting wood dust, leading to fatal explosion at wood pellet manufacturer
【24h】

Inherent hazards, poor reporting and limited learning in the solid biomass energy sector: A case study of a wheel loader igniting wood dust, leading to fatal explosion at wood pellet manufacturer

机译:固体生物质能领域固有的危害,报告不力以及学习有限:以轮式装载机点燃木屑为例,导致木屑颗粒制造商致命爆炸的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Large loaders are commonly used when handling solid biomass fuels. A preventable accident took place in 2010, where the malfunction of a front-end wheel loader led to a dust explosion which killed the driver and destroyed the building. The case offers an opportunity to examine the hazards of solid biomass, the accident investigation and any learning that subsequently took place. The paper argues that learning opportunities were missed repeatedly. Significant root causes were not identified; principles of inherent safety in design were ignored; the hazardous area classification was based on flawed reasoning; the ATEX assessment was inadequate as it dealt only with electrical installations, ignoring work operations; and powered industrial trucks had not been recognized as a source of ignition. Perhaps most importantly, guidelines for hazardous area classification for combustible dust are insufficiently developed and give ample room for potentially erroneous subjective individual . judgment. It is a contributing factor that combustible dust, although with great hazard potential, is not classified as a dangerous substance. Accidents therefore fall outside the scope of systems designed to disseminate lessons learned and prevent future accidents. More attention to safety is needed for the renewable energy and environmentally friendly biomass pellet industry also to become sustainable from a worker safety perspective.
机译:在处理固体生物质燃料时,通常使用大型装载机。 2010年发生了可预防的事故,前端轮式装载机的故障导致粉尘爆炸,炸死驾驶员并摧毁了建筑物。该案例为检查固体生物质的危害,事故调查以及随后进行的任何学习提供了机会。该论文认为,学习机会一再被错过。未发现明显的根本原因;设计中固有的安全性原则被忽略;危险区域分类基于错误的推理; ATEX评估不充分,因为它仅涉及电气装置,而忽略了工作操作;动力工业卡车未被认为是着火源。也许最重要的是,关于可燃粉尘危险区域分类的指南还不够完善,为潜在错误的主观个体提供了足够的空间。判断。导致可燃粉尘尽管具有很大的潜在危险,却没有被归类为危险物质,这是一个促成因素。因此,事故不在旨在传播经验教训并防止将来发生事故的系统范围内。从工人安全的角度来看,可再生能源和环保型生物质颗粒工业也需要更加重视安全性,以使其可持续发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号