首页> 外文期刊>British journal of industrial Relations >Improvisers, Increments lists and Strategists: How and Why Organizations Adopt ADR Innovations
【24h】

Improvisers, Increments lists and Strategists: How and Why Organizations Adopt ADR Innovations

机译:即兴,增量列表和策略师:组织如何以及为何采用ADR创新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article identifies three ways in which alternative dispute resolution (ADR) innovations are adopted by organizations in Ireland: improvisation, incrementalism and strategy, and examines how external and internal influences shape different patterns of ADR innovation. The article contributes to the literature in three ways. First, it highlights the limitations of typologies of innovation based on simple dichotomies, such as reactive/proactive and of prevailing understandings of how ADR may interact with strategy. Second, the article develops an integrated framework for the analysis of influences on patterns of innovation that distinguishes between the features of markets and commercial strategies, organizations, stakeholders and champions and institutions, laws and public policies. Third, the article questions the central premise underlying the literature that a strategic approach to ADR equates with the adoption of conflict management systems.
机译:本文确定了爱尔兰组织采用替代性争议解决(ADR)创新的三种方式:即兴,增量主义和战略,并研究了外部和内部影响如何塑造ADR创新的不同模式。本文通过三种方式为文献做出了贡献。首先,它强调了基于简单的二分法的创新类型学的局限性,例如反应性/主动性,以及对ADR如何与策略相互作用的普遍理解。其次,本文开发了一个综合框架,用于分析对创新模式的影响,从而区分市场和商业策略,组织,利益相关者和拥护者与机构,法律和公共政策的特征。第三,文章质疑文学基础的中心前提,即针对ADR的战略方法等同于采用冲突管理系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号