...
首页> 外文期刊>Building and Environment >Modelling double skin facades (DSFs) in whole-building energy simulation tools: Validation and inter-software comparison of a mechanically ventilated single-story DSF
【24h】

Modelling double skin facades (DSFs) in whole-building energy simulation tools: Validation and inter-software comparison of a mechanically ventilated single-story DSF

机译:在整个建筑能量仿真工具中建模双层皮肤外墙(DSF):机械通风的单层DSF的验证和软件间比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Double skin facades (DSFs) have been proposed as responsive building systems to improve the building envelope's performance. Reliable simulation of DSF performance is a prerequisite to support the design and implementation of these systems in real buildings. Building energy simulation (BES) tools are commonly used by practitioners to predict the whole building energy performance, but the simulation of the thermophysical behaviour of DSFs may be challenging when carried out through BES tools. Using an exhaust-air facade case study, we analyse and assess the reliability of four popular BES tools when these are used to simulate a DSF, either through available in-built models or through custom-built representations based on zonal models. We carry out this study by comparing numerical simulations and experimental data for a series of significant thermophysical quantities, and we reflect on the performance and limitations of the different tools. The results show that no tool is outstandingly better performing over the others, but some tools offer better predictions when the focus is placed on certain thermophysical quantities, while others should be chosen if the focus is on different ones. After comparing the different models' limitations and challenges, we conclude that BES tools can simulate the performance of DSF systems over long periods. However, their use alone is not recommended when the simulation's scope is to replicate and study short-term phenomena and dynamic aspects, such as sizing the building's HVAC system.
机译:已提出双层皮肤外墙(DSF)作为响应式建筑系统,以提高建筑信封的性能。可靠的DSF性能模拟是支持在真实建筑中设计和实施这些系统的先决条件。从业者通常使用建筑能量模拟(BES)工具来预测整个建筑能量性能,但在通过BES工具进行时,DSF的热理行为的仿真可能是具有挑战性的。使用排气门面案例研究,我们分析并评估四个流行的BES工具的可靠性,当这些都用于模拟DSF,无论是通过可用的内置模型还是通过基于区域模型的定制构建的表示。我们通过比较数值模拟和实验数据进行一系列显着的热物理量来进行本研究,我们反思了不同工具的性能和限制。结果表明,在其他工具上没有更好地表现出更好的表现,但是当焦点放在某些热神耳物质上时,一些工具可以更好地提供更好的预测,而其他工具则应选择其他工具如果焦点在不同的那些中,则应选择其他工具。在比较不同的模型的局限和挑战之后,我们得出结论,BES工具可以在长时间模拟DSF系统的性能。但是,当模拟的范围是复制和研究短期现象和动态方面时,不建议单独使用它们,例如尺寸大小化建筑的HVAC系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号