...
首页> 外文期刊>Building and Environment >Development of the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database Ⅱ
【24h】

Development of the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database Ⅱ

机译:ASHRAE全球热舒适性数据库Ⅱ的开发

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recognizing the value of open-source research databases in advancing the art and science of HVAC, in 2014 the ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II project was launched under the leadership of University of California at Berkeley's Center for the Built Environment and The University of Sydney's Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) Laboratory. The exercise began with a systematic collection and harmonization of raw data from the last two decades of thermal comfort field studies around the world. The ASHRAE Global Thermal Comfort Database II (Comfort Database), now an online, open-source database, includes approximately 81,846 complete sets of objective indoor climatic observations with accompanying “right-here-right-now” subjective evaluations by the building occupants who were exposed to them. The database is intended to support diverse inquiries about thermal comfort in field settings. A simple web-based interface to the database enables filtering on multiple criteria, including building typology, occupancy type, subjects' demographic variables, subjective thermal comfort states, indoor thermal environmental criteria, calculated comfort indices, environmental control criteria and outdoor meteorological information. Furthermore, a web-based interactive thermal comfort visualization tool has been developed that allows end-users to quickly and interactively explore the data.
机译:认识到开放源代码研究数据库在促进HVAC的艺术和科学方面的价值,2014年,在加利福尼亚大学伯克利分校建筑环境中心和悉尼大学室内分校的领导下,启动了ASHRAE全球热舒适数据库II项目环境质量(IEQ)实验室。这项工作始于对全球近二十年来热舒适领域研究的原始数据进行系统的收集和统一。 ASHRAE全球热舒适数据库II(舒适数据库),现在是一个在线开放源数据库,包括大约81,846套完整的客观室内气候观测数据,以及伴随着“按时就诊”的主观评估,这些评估是由建筑用房的人进行的。暴露给他们。该数据库旨在支持有关现场设置中的热舒适性的各种查询。一个基于Web的简单的基于Web的界面可以过滤多个标准,包括建筑物类型,入住类型,受试者的人口统计学变量,主观热舒适状态,室内热环境标准,计算出的舒适指数,环境控制标准和户外气象信息。此外,已经开发了基于Web的交互式热舒适性可视化工具,该工具允许最终用户快速且交互式地浏览数据。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Building and Environment》 |2018年第9期|502-512|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Center for the Built Environment, University of California;

    Berkeley Education Alliance for Research in Singapore;

    Center for the Built Environment, University of California;

    IEQ Laboratory, School of Architecture Design and Planning, The University of Sydney;

    IEQ Laboratory, School of Architecture Design and Planning, The University of Sydney;

    Center for the Built Environment, University of California;

    Department of Interior Architecture and Built Environment, Yonsei University;

    Center for the Built Environment, University of California;

    Center for the Built Environment, University of California;

    Center for the Built Environment, University of California;

    Department of Civil Engineering, The University of British Columbia;

    Center for the Built Environment, University of California;

    Department of Architecture, University of Lagos;

    School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University;

    School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University;

    Ecole Nationale d'Ingenieurs de Tunis (ENIT, Rue Béchir Salem Belkhiria Campus Universitaire;

    Department of Building Services, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava;

    School of Architecture, Design and Planning, The University of Sydney;

    Department of Building Science, School of Architecture, Tsinghua University;

    Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering;

    Department of Building, School of Design and Environment National, University of Singapore;

    Building Science, School of Architecture, University of Southern California;

    School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University;

    School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University;

    IEQ Laboratory, School of Architecture Design and Planning, The University of Sydney;

    School of Architecture, University of Teheran;

    Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qatar University;

    Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology;

    School of Architecture and Planning, Catholic University of America;

    IEQ Laboratory, School of Architecture Design and Planning, The University of Sydney;

    School of Architecture, University of Southern California;

    Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo;

    Department of Architecture, University of Oregon;

    Federal University of Santa Catarina;

    School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University;

    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory;

    Centre for Advanced Research in Building Science and Energy CEPT University;

    Building Science Group, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology;

    School of Architecture, Faculty of Technology, Design and Environment, Oxford Brookes University, Headington Campus;

    Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo;

    Environmental Engineering Group, Building Research Establishment, Watford;

    End-use Efficiency Research Group, Dipartimento Di Energia, Politecnico Di Milano;

    Department of Building Services, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava;

    Center for Advanced Research in Building Science and Energy, CEOT University;

    Posgrado en Arquitectura, Facultad de Arquitectura y Diseño, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California;

    Faculty of Environmental Studies, Dept. of Restoration Ecology & Built Environment, Tokyo City University;

    Department of Building, School of Design and Environment National, University of Singapore;

    Building Science Group, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology;

    Sustainable Buildings Research Centre (SBRC), University of Wollongong;

    Department of Architecture, Waseda University;

    Department of Building, School of Design and Environment National, University of Singapore;

    Sustainable Energy Research Group, Division of Energy and Climate Change, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton;

    International Centre for Indoor Environment and Energy, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark;

    School of Engineering and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University;

    Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology;

    Federal University of Santa Catarina;

    Building Science Group, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology;

    Department of Building Thermal Engineering, School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology;

    Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology;

    School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh;

    State Key Laboratory of Green Building in Western China, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology;

    Department of Building Science, School of Architecture, Tsinghua University;

    State Key Laboratory of Green Building in Western China, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology;

    State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, Department of Architecture, South China University of Technology;

    Institute of Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Engineering, College of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Thermal comfort; Field study; Data repository; Visualization tool;

    机译:热舒适度现场研究数据仓库可视化工具;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号