...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Building and Environment >Canadian practitioners' perception of research work investigating the cost premiums, long-term costs and health and productivity benefits of green buildings
【24h】

Canadian practitioners' perception of research work investigating the cost premiums, long-term costs and health and productivity benefits of green buildings

机译：加拿大从业人员对研究绿色建筑成本溢价，长期成本以及健康和生产力收益的研究工作的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Despite evidence suggesting conflicting views between practitioners and researchers when it comes to estimating the costs and financial benefits of green buildings, there exists no research work that has attempted to investigate practitioners' perception, and in particular Canadian practitioners', of the work conducted by researchers. To fill this gap in the literature, a web-based anonymous survey was administered to 1200 LEED accredited professionals in Canada to assess, among other things, practitioners' awareness, and confidence in research work assessing the cost premiums, long-term cost benefits, and health and productivity benefits of green buildings. The statistical analysis of the data using t-tests and mixed-model ANOVA tests showed that Canadian practitioners were still uncertain about results of the literature. Despite a slow change in attitudes the longer they worked in the field, practitioners continued to identify high cost premiums as the primary barrier to investing in green practices, and energy cost savings as the most important type of savings incurred in green buildings. The majority were uncertain about the size and impact of productivity and health benefits, and about how best to measure them. First-time adopters of LEED usually found the cost and complexity of the system prohibitive. Many believed that the decision to go green rested ultimately with the owner. That is why future research work needs to focus on improving knowledge transfer between practitioners and researchers and on improving the rigour and accuracy of the literature by using more empirical data, and getting practitioners to endorse research work in the field.
机译：尽管有证据表明，在评估绿色建筑的成本和财务收益时，从业者与研究者之间存在意见分歧，但尚无研究工作试图调查从业者，特别是加拿大从业者对研究者所做工作的看法。为了填补文献中的空白，对加拿大的1200名获得LEED认证的专业人员进行了基于网络的匿名调查，以评估从业人员的意识以及对研究工作的信心，以评估成本溢价，长期成本收益，以及绿色建筑对健康和生产力的好处。使用t检验和混合模型ANOVA检验对数据进行统计分析表明，加拿大从业人员仍不确定文献的结果。尽管态度变化缓慢，但他们在该领域工作的时间越长，他们仍然认为高成本溢价是投资绿色实践的主要障碍，而能源成本节省是绿色建筑中最重要的节能类型。大多数人不确定生产力和健康益处的规模和影响，以及如何最好地衡量它们。 LEED的首次采用者通常会发现该系统的成本和复杂性令人望而却步。许多人认为，走向绿色的决定最终取决于所有者。因此，未来的研究工作需要着重于改善从业者与研究者之间的知识转移，并通过使用更多的经验数据来提高文献的严格性和准确性，并促使从业者认可该领域的研究工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号