• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Building research & information >Policy gaps: future challenges for research
【24h】

Policy gaps: future challenges for research

机译：政策差距：研究的未来挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This commentary considers the Building Research & Information special issue (volume 43/4) entitled 'Closing the Policy Gaps: From Formulation to Outcomes'. Although the call for papers received an international response, the special issue has a focus on cases of policy-making and outcomes in the UK. A critical review is presented addressing several questions for the international research, consultancy and policy-making communities. What can these international communities learn from the presented examples? How do variations in governance regimes and structures influence policy formulation and outcomes, particularly the reduction in policy 'gaps'? What future steps could be taken to produce more internationally oriented comparative research on policy-making and implementation regarding the built environment and urban-regional development? How can evidence and analysis be used to build theory? Do the research and consultancy communities need to improve their policy literacy? What lessons can the research community, in particular, learn from this process in advising on policy formation and implementation processes?
机译：本评论考虑了《建筑研究与信息》特刊（第43/4卷），题为“缩小政策差距：从制定到成果”。尽管征集论文的请求得到了国际上的回应，但本期专刊重点关注英国的决策案例和成果。提出了一项重要的评论，以解决国际研究，咨询和政策制定界的几个问题。这些国际社区可以从提出的例子中学到什么？治理制度和结构的变化如何影响政策制定和结果，尤其是政策“差距”的减少？在建筑环境和城市区域发展的政策制定和实施方面，未来可以采取哪些步骤来进行更具国际性的比较研究？如何使用证据和分析来建立理论？研究和咨询社区是否需要提高其政策素养？在为政策制定和实施过程提供建议时，研究界尤其可以从该过程中学到什么教训？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号