首页> 外文期刊>Building research & information >Buildings And The Loss Of Public Arts
【24h】

Buildings And The Loss Of Public Arts

机译:建筑物与公共艺术的流失

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The first sentence of the Preface of The Judicious Eye reads: 'Painting and sculpture once counted with architecture as "visual arts'". This thought strikes one as strangely reversed: surely architecture, with its invitations to movement, sound, smell (not to mention numerous pragmatic, extra-sensory conditions), must be the art, not painting and sculpture, to have escaped the category of 'visual arts'. But with a historian and author of the stature of Joseph Rykwert, one should of course expect that he means what he says. And he does. Rykwert shows irritation with: those people who call themselves 'artists', ... a self-defined class of workers, fabricators of anything exhibited or that can be marketed as 'art', [and] describe themselves, with more or less justice, as fighting the forces of reaction, convention, banality. 'That avant-garde of the second half of the twentieth century was shown the way by Marcel Duchamp'.
机译:《明智之眼》序言的第一句话是:“绘画和雕塑曾经被视为建筑的“视觉艺术”。这种想法遭到了一个奇怪的逆转:建筑,必然带有运动,声音,气味(更不用说许多实用,超感官的条件了),必须是艺术,而不是绘画和雕塑,才能摆脱“视觉艺术'。但是,由于历史学家和约瑟夫·雷克韦特(Joseph Rykwert)的身高,作者当然应该期望他是他所说的。而且他做到了。瑞克韦特(Rykwert)激怒了以下人士:自称“艺术家”的那些人,......一个自定义的工人阶级,任何展出或可以作为“艺术品”销售的制造者,[或]或多或少地描述了自己,作为反动,常规,平庸的力量。 “二十世纪下半叶的前卫作品由马塞尔·杜尚(Marcel Duchamp)展示了出来”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号