• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering >EARTHQUAKE RISK (PRONE) BUILDINGS - THE GISBORNE EXPERIENCE
【24h】

EARTHQUAKE RISK (PRONE) BUILDINGS - THE GISBORNE EXPERIENCE

机译：地震风险（成本）建筑-GISBORNE体验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Recent completion of the Earthquake Risk (Prone) survey of unreinforced masonry buildings in the Gisborne District provides an opportunity to review the results achieved and, bearing in mind the re-draft of the Red Book, reflect on observed behaviour of local buildings in two "moderate" or close to "moderate" earthquakes. This paper gives a brief summary of the results of the Gisborne survey then discusses some of the actual damage sustained by the unreinforced masonry building stock in comparison with ground accelerations recorded in the 1966 "Gisborne" and 1993 "Ormond" earthquakes. Further comparison is made against theoretical loadings as represented by the 1965 and current design codes, and strengths as represented by the "Red Book" and its successor. The paper concludes with comment on the Earthquake Risk (Prone) Buildings survey process and "capture" threshold strength levels to be embodied in future legislative changes.
机译：吉斯伯恩（Gisborne）地区未加固的砖石建筑最近完成的地震风险（Prone）调查提供了一个机会，可以回顾所取得的成果，并牢记《红皮书》的重新起草，对在两个“中度”或接近“中度”地震。本文简要介绍了吉斯伯恩（Gisborne）调查的结果，然后讨论了与1966年“吉斯伯恩”（Gisborne）和1993年“奥蒙德”（Ormond）地震记录的地面加速度相比，未加固的砖石建筑房屋遭受的实际破坏。进一步比较了1965年代表的理论载荷和当前的设计规范，以及“红皮书”及其后继代表的优势。最后，本文对地震风险（无人驾驶）建筑物的调查过程以及将要体现在未来立法变化中的“捕获”阈值强度水平进行了评论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号