...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society >Adventitious Presence of Patented Genetically Modified Organisms on Private Premises: Is Intent Necessary for Actions in Infringement Against the Property Owner?
【24h】

Adventitious Presence of Patented Genetically Modified Organisms on Private Premises: Is Intent Necessary for Actions in Infringement Against the Property Owner?

机译：私有财产中转基因生物的不定身份存在：是否有必要采取行动侵犯财产所有人？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The law of patents has long struggled with the status of intent in determining liability for infringement. This struggle has recently been given a sharper edge by the emergence of biotechnological products with the inherent ability of auto-dispersal and regeneration. The question thus is whether a person on whose backyard a patented genetic organism has grown without the active intervention of that person is liable in infringement to the patentee of that organism. This article examines the ramifications of the legal conundrum and argues that on a proper construction of the theories of liability in patent law intent to infringe is necessarily crucial if the nature of the subject matter of the patent makes it unjust and absurd to argue otherwise.
机译：专利法长期以来一直在确定侵权责任的意图地位。最近，具有固有的自动分散和再生能力的生物技术产品的出现使这种斗争更加尖锐。因此，问题是，在没有专利遗传生物的积极干预的情况下，在其后院生长的某个人是否应对该生物的专利权人构成侵权。本文研究了法律难题的后果，并指出，如果专利主题的性质使其不公正和荒谬地提出异议，那么在专利法中责任理论的适当构建上至关重要的是意图侵权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号