• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society >Intellectual Property Law as an Internal Limit on Intellectual Property Rights and Autonomous Source of Liability for Intellectual Property Owners
【24h】

Intellectual Property Law as an Internal Limit on Intellectual Property Rights and Autonomous Source of Liability for Intellectual Property Owners

机译：知识产权法作为知识产权的内部限制和知识产权所有者的自主责任来源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article considers the interplay between intellectual property rights and classic property rights raised by Hoffman v. Monsanto (2005) and advances the idea that intellectual property law can serve as an autonomous source of liability for intellectual property owners. The article develops the conceptual advantages of demarcating physical and intellectual properties and allocating rights and responsibilities based on the respective property sphere. It introduces a theoretical Hohfeldian framework, in which the grant of a positive limited-term monopoly right entails a corresponding duty, to establish intellectual property law as a source of internal limits on intellectual property rights. The article is a prolegomena to a detailed matrix of those rights and duties within intellectual property law. This matrix could support patentee duties that go beyond public disclosure of the invention and could establish patent law as an alternative legal framework to tort law to address harms caused by inventions.
机译：本文考虑了Hoffman诉Monsanto（2005）提出的知识产权与经典产权之间的相互作用，并提出了知识产权法可以作为知识产权所有者的自主责任来源的观点。本文提出了在物理和知识产权之间划界以及根据各自的财产领域分配权利和责任的概念优势。它引入了理论上的霍菲尔德理论框架，在该框架中，授予积极的有限期垄断权需要承担相应的义务，以确立知识产权法作为知识产权内部限制的来源。本文是知识产权法中这些权利和义务的详细矩阵的序言。该矩阵可以支持专利权人承担的职责，而这些职责不仅仅限于公开披露发明，还可以将专利法确立为侵权法的替代法律框架，以解决发明造成的损害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号