首页> 外文期刊>Business Ethics >Decision making in compromise situations: guidelines based on J. S. Mill's doctrine of political half-measures
【24h】

Decision making in compromise situations: guidelines based on J. S. Mill's doctrine of political half-measures

机译:折衷方案下的决策:基于J. Mill的政治半措施理论的指导方针

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this article is to offer guidelines to deal with hard choices, specifically in situations where some compromise among opposing values is inescapable. The guidelines are intended to help ethicists and practitioners to delineate different alternatives and to dismiss some of them as morally unacceptable. This article explores the view that compromises arise from negotiations but from ethical predicaments as well. For this reason, I distinguish between strategic and moral compromises. Both managers and employees are individual moral agents who have to confront the possibility of unpalatable and even disgusting compromises, so that they are forced to put their integrity into risk in certain compromise situations. However, I shall argue for the possibility of palatable moral compromises. The guidelines to cope with those situations and to identify the unpalatable compromises are based on J. S. Mill's moral philosophy. Mill suggested that half-measures passed in Parliament must have certain key elements to be morally acceptable. I make use of this doctrine to put forward compromise guidelines in the form of a set of hallmarks, internal and external elements of palatable compromises. Two minicases are used to test the guidelines and to emphasize the importance of compromises for ethical decision making and commitment to company.
机译:本文的目的是为处理艰难的选择提供指导,尤其是在不可避免的对立价值观之间必须做出妥协的情况下。该准则旨在帮助伦理学家和从业者划定不同的选择,并从道德上接受这些选择。本文探讨了这样一种观点,即妥协来自谈判,但也来自道德困境。因此,我区分战略和道德折衷。经理和雇员都是道德的个体,他们必须面对令人难以接受甚至令人作呕的妥协的可能性,以便他们在某些妥协情况下被迫将自己的正直置于风险之中。但是,我将争论可口的道德妥协的可能性。应对这些情况和识别难吃的妥协的指导方针是基于J. S. Mill的道德哲学。米尔认为,议会通过的半措施必须具有某些关键要素,才能在道德上被接受。我利用这一学说以一系列标志,可口妥协的内在和外在要素的形式提出了妥协指南。两个小案例用于测试指南,并强调折衷对于道德决策和对公司的承诺的重要性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Business Ethics》 |2014年第4期|364-374|共11页
  • 作者

    Rafael Cejudo;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Cordoba, Spain;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号