...
首页> 外文期刊>Business week >BOARDROOM CHARITY: REFORMS DONT GO FAR ENOUGH
【24h】

BOARDROOM CHARITY: REFORMS DONT GO FAR ENOUGH

机译:董事会慈善活动:改革并没有取得足够的成功

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Charities that get some $11 billion a year from Corporate America have come into the sights of post-Enron reformers. It's high time. For years, companies have obscured conflicts of interests behind the apple-pie image of charity. It took Enron Corp.'s devotion to the causes of several of its directors to focus investors' minds on how such gifts can potentially compromise board independence. One glaring example is John Mendelsohn, president of the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Enron, its then-chairman Kenneth Lay, and their foundations collectively gave the center $332,150, after Mendelsohn became an Enron director. Mendelsohn, who wasn't available to com-ment, is a member of Enron's key audit committee.
机译:每年从美国企业协会获得约110亿美元收入的慈善机构已经成为安然后改革者的视线。是时候了多年来,公司掩盖了苹果派慈善形象背后的利益冲突。安然公司(Enron Corp.)致力于其几位董事的事业,使投资者的思想集中在此类礼物如何可能损害董事会独立性上。著名的安德森癌症中心主任约翰·门德尔松就是一个很好的例子。在门德尔松(Mendelsohn)成为安然董事之后,安然,当时的董事长肯尼斯·莱(Kenneth Lay)及其基金会共同为该中心捐款332,150美元。门德尔松(Mendelsohn)并未对此发表评论,他是安然(Enron)关键审计委员会的成员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号