• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge Review of International Affairs >Towards a new aid paradigm: South Africa as African development partner
【24h】

Towards a new aid paradigm: South Africa as African development partner

机译：迈向新的援助范式：南非成为非洲发展伙伴

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As the largest African economy and the leading African aid-provider, with plans to establish an aid agency, South Africa is often ranked among the developing world's a??emerging donorsa??. However, the country's development cooperation commitments are smaller in scope, scale and ambition than the aid regimes of the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India, China) or Gulf state donors. Given its limited resources and domestic socioeconomic challenges, South Africa prefers the role of a??development partnera??. In this role, South Africa's development cooperation in Africa has ranged from peacekeeping, electoral reform and post-conflict reconstruction to support for strengthening regional and continental institutions, implementing the New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) and improving bilateral political and economic relations through dialogue and cooperation. This article seeks to determine whether Pretoria's development cooperation offers an alternative perspective to the aid policies and practices of the traditional and large rising donors. We conclude that South Africa does not fit neatly the a??donora?? category of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's (OECD's) Development Assistance Committee (DAC) and neither is Pretoria's aid-spending typically a??ODAa?? (official development assistance). Instead, with its new aid agency, South Africa occupies a unique space in Africa's development cooperation landscape. With fewer aid resources, but a a??comparative advantagea?? in understanding Africa's security/governance/development nexus, South Africa can play an instrumental role in facilitating trilateral partnerships, especially in Southern Africa.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2012.744638
机译：作为非洲最大的经济体和领先的非洲援助提供者，并计划建立一个援助机构，南非经常跻身于发展中国家的“新兴捐助国”之列。但是，与金砖四国（巴西，俄罗斯，印度，中国）或海湾国家捐助者的援助制度相比，该国的发展合作承诺在范围，规模和抱负上都较小。由于资源有限和国内社会经济挑战，南非更喜欢“发展伙伴”的角色。在这一角色中，南非在非洲的发展合作包括维持和平，选举改革和冲突后重建，以支持加强区域和大陆机构，实施非洲发展新伙伴关系（NEPAD），以及通过对话改善双边政治和经济关系与合作。本文旨在确定比勒陀利亚的发展合作是否为传统的和大型的捐助国的援助政策和做法提供了另一种视角。我们得出的结论是，南非不适合a？donora？经济合作与发展组织（OECD）发展援助委员会（DAC）的类别，比勒陀利亚的援助支出通常都不是“ ODAa”？ （官方发展援助）。取而代之的是，南非通过其新的援助机构在非洲发展合作领域占据了独特的空间。援助资源较少，但却具有“比较优势”？在理解非洲的安全/治理/发展关系时，南非可以在促进三边伙伴关系（尤其是在南部非洲）中发挥重要作用。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，service_compact：“ citeulike， netvibes，推特，technorati，可口，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”：true，“ ui_click”：true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2012.744638

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号