• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cambridge Review of International Affairs >Empire and modernity: dynastic centralization and official nationalism in late imperial Ethiopia
【24h】

Empire and modernity: dynastic centralization and official nationalism in late imperial Ethiopia

机译：帝国与现代：埃塞俄比亚帝国后期的王朝集权化和官方民族主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Conventional accounts of modern state-formation either underplay its contradictory and variegated character or neglect its international dimensions. Against these approaches, alternative theories of state-formation have emerged centred on the constitutive significance of intersocietal relations and differential temporalities. This article develops the latter approaches in relation to the Ethiopian state. Contrary to widespread assumptions of Ethiopia's political insularity, it suggests that at three crucial turning points geopolitical exigencies provided the critical impetus for the political and cultural reconstitution of the state. Late nineteenth century European colonial encroachment triggered a reaction in the form of an Ethiopian imperial expansion to rival them. And the political shock of Italian occupation 40 years later provoked a concurrent project of dynastic centralization and official nationalism in the post-restoration period. But precisely because divine monarchy and nationalism are antithetical orders by virtue of their opposed principles of sovereignty, the attempt to conjoin them generated deep social and cultural contradictions that erupted in two successive revolutions that were internationally overdetermined and resulted in a profound reconstitution of the Ethiopian state.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.558056
机译：关于现代国家形成的传统说法要么表现出其矛盾和多样化的特征，要么忽略了其国际层面。反对这些方法，出现了关于国家形成的替代理论，这些理论围绕社会间关系和时空差异的构成性意义而出现。本文开发了与埃塞俄比亚国家有关的后一种方法。与埃塞俄比亚政治孤立的广泛假设相反，它表明，在三个关键的转折点，地缘政治迫切性为国家政治和文化重建提供了关键动力。 19世纪末，欧洲殖民主义入侵以埃塞俄比亚帝国扩张的形式引发了与之抗衡的反应。 40年后，意大利占领的政治冲击引发了恢复后时期王朝集权化和官方民族主义的并发工程。但正是由于神圣君主制和民族主义由于其对立的主权原则而成为对立的秩序，将它们结合起来的尝试产生了深刻的社会和文化矛盾，在国际上被高估的连续两次革命中爆发，并导致埃塞俄比亚国家的深刻重建查看全文下载全文相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布ID：“ ra- 4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.558056

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号