...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Environmental Law Reports >Gray v. Canada (Attorney General)
【24h】

Gray v. Canada (Attorney General)

机译:灰色v。加拿大(律师将军)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Environmental law-Statutory protection of environment - Environmental offences - Miscellaneous-Minister of Environment and Climate Change investigated importation of vehicles with prohibited emissions defeat devices, contrary to of Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 - Minister refused to open investigations into applicants' allegations against certain automaker about fraudulent emissions devices, on basis that allegations were already under investigation - Applicants' judicial review application was dismissed by Federal Court, which held that decision not to investigate was reasonable - Investigation resulted in criminal convictions and sentences against automaker, settled via global plea agreement - Applicants appealed to Federal Court of Appeal - Attorney General moved to dismiss appeal as moot - Motion granted; appeal dismissed - Discretion exercised against hearing appeal -Allegations had already been investigated and resulted in convictions and sentences in criminal court - Plea agreement settled all issues globally involving automaker - Public interest had been served by convictions and sentences given to automaker and public disclosure of what led to that consequence, which had been given in criminal court - Plea agreement, prosecutorial discretion to enter into it, and sentences ordered by criminal court could not be reviewed by Federal Court of Appeal - Civil redress had been obtained through class action settlement - In law, there was nothing further for Minister to investigate, so any order would have no practical consequences.
机译:环境法律保护环境 - 环境犯罪 - 环境犯罪 - 环境罪和气候变化的杂项部长调查了与加拿大环境保护法案相反的禁止排放设备的进口,违反了申请人对某些申请人的指控关于欺诈性排放设备的汽车制造商,在申请人的司法审查申请的基础上,联邦法院驳回了申请人的司法审查申请,该决定不调查是合理的 - 调查导致刑事定罪和对汽车制造商的判决,通过全球辩护解决协议 - 申请人上诉上诉法院 - 律师将军搬迁将上诉视为理所当然的议案;呼吁解雇 - 针对听证呼吁的自由裁量权已经调查,并导致刑事法院的定罪和判决 - 请求协议解决了全球涉及的所有问题 - 公共利益通过对汽车制造商的定罪和判决提供了公共利益和公开披露导致了在刑事法院 - 请求的后果 - 请征收违规行动,并通过课程行动结算获得了联邦上诉法院未经审查刑事法院订购的判决 - 法律,部长没有进一步调查,因此任何订单都没有实际后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号