• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Environmental Law Reports >[Indexed as: Ktunaxa Nation Council v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations)]
【24h】

[Indexed as: Ktunaxa Nation Council v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations)]

机译：[索引为：Ktunaxa国家委员会诉不列颠哥伦比亚省（森林，土地和自然资源运营部长）]

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Aboriginal law-Constitutional issues - Constitution Act, 1982- Duty to consult and accommodate - Company and Minister of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operation signed development agreement regarding proposed ski resort on Crown land - First Nation claimed that proposed resort would desecrate sacred area of paramount spiritual importance within claimed traditional territory - Specifically, First Nation asserted that permanent overnight human accommodation would cause Grizzly Bear spirit to leave sacred site - First Nation brought petition for judicial review seeking relief including declaration that agreement violated duty to consult and accommodate under s. 35 of Constitution Act, 1982 - Petition dismissed - Consultation process in respect of First Nation's asserted spiritual right was deep - Noteworthy that First Nation had not challenged regulatory approvals - First Nation first asserted right as primary concern only after 15-year consulation process, which had involved extensive opportunity for First Nation to express concerns about proposed resort - Three years of further discussions and negotiations with First Nation followed before agreement was approved - Record did not disclose cavalier attitude or complete disregard to First Nation's spiritual concerns -Viewed globally, record involved meetings, exchanges and accommodation offers amounting to reasonable process of consultation and accommodation - Accommodations offered included amendments and revisions to proposed resort which fell within range of reasonable responses and satisfied Crown's duty in s. 35 of Act.
机译：原住民法律-宪法问题-1982年宪法法案-征求意见和提供住宿的权利-公司与森林，土地和自然资源部部长签署了有关在皇冠土地上提议的滑雪胜地的开发协议-第一民族声称提议的胜地将亵渎圣地的神圣区域在宣称的传统领土内具有最高的精神重要性-特别是，第一民族主张永久性的过夜居住会导致灰熊精神离开神圣的场所-第一民族提请司法复审，寻求救济，包括宣布协议违反了根据S进行协商和容纳的义务。 1982年《宪法法》第35条-驳回请愿权-关于原住民宣称的精神权利的磋商程序很深-值得注意的是，原住民没有对监管批准提出异议-仅在15年的协商过程之后，原住民才首次将权利作为主要关注事项为原住民带来了广泛的机会来表达对拟议度假胜地的担忧-在协议获得批准之前，与原住民进行了三年的进一步讨论和谈判-唱片未透露骑士的态度或完全无视原住民的精神关切-在全球范围内查看，涉及唱片会议，交流和住宿要约等于合理的协商和住宿程序-所提供的要塞包括对拟议度假胜地的修正和修订，属于合理回应范围之内，并满足Crown的职责。法令35。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号