...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of communication >Editorial
【24h】

Editorial

机译：社论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The CBC has been in crisis for decades and continues to limp along as one of the most poorly funded public broadcasters in the world. Here, Brooks DeCillia and Patrick McCurdy examine Canadian news and commentary coverage of the CBC between 2009 and 2014 quantitatively and qualitatively. Although 66 percent of their sample referred to the CBC's troubled status (N = 467), only 10.5 percent connected the discussion to the idea of public service broadcasting. That silence means, DeCillia and McCurdy argue, that in the absence of more extended discussion of public service broadcasting, a neoliberal discourse has become discursively hegemonic for news media's treatment of the CBC. They go on to show the extent of CBC executives' entanglement with the assumptions of neoliberal discourse. What the authors' analysis shows, above all, is the disconnect between an "idealized academic discussion" of public service broadcasting and the neoliberal conversation in popular media in Canada. As a result of this disconnect, public broadcasting in Canada is viewed-in large part-as an extension of the market. Efficiency, ratings, and accountability define and narrow the horizon of possibilities for communication and action surrounding the public broadcaster. Values of citizenship, democracy, and bolstering arts and culture are largely marginalized-and rarely given a full-throated defence by CBC officials and others.
机译：CBC陷入危机已有数十年之久，并且一直是世界上资金最匮乏的公共广播公司之一，一直在衰败。在这里，布鲁克斯·德西里亚（Brooks DeCillia）和帕特里克·麦卡迪（Patrick McCurdy）定量和定性地研究了加拿大在2009年至2014年间对加拿大广播公司的新闻和评论报道。尽管他们的样本中有66％提到了CBC的困境状态（N = 467），但只有10.5％的讨论将讨论与公共服务广播的理念联系起来。 DeCillia和McCurdy认为，这种沉默意味着，在没有对公共服务广播进行更深入讨论的情况下，新自由主义的话语已经成为新闻媒体对待CBC的话语权。他们继续表明，CBC高管对新自由主义话语假设的纠缠程度。作者的分析显示，最重要的是，公共广播的“理想化学术讨论”与加拿大大众媒体中的新自由主义对话之间的脱节。由于这种脱节，加拿大的公共广播在很大程度上被视为市场的延伸。效率，等级和责任制定义并缩小了围绕公共广播公司的交流和行动的可能性。公民，民主和支持艺术和文化的价值观在很大程度上被边缘化了，很少得到CBC官员和其他人的全面支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号