• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of communication >Assessing Media Democracy
【24h】

Assessing Media Democracy

机译：评估媒体民主

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There was a time when democracy was directly linked to one's possibility of influ-encing political decision making. One person was equal to one vote or one voice. Although the spirit of this initial understanding still lingers, democracy is now regarded as a more complex concept, and represents a variety of elements such as a system, a state, a mechanism of control, as well as a series of principles and practices, as is made evident through any modern dictionary's definition of the word. Oxford Dictionaries, for example, defines democracy as "a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives," "a state governed under a system of democracy," or the "control of an organization or group by the majority of its members," or "the practice or principles of social equality".
机译：曾经有一段时间，民主与人们影响政治决策的可能性直接相关。一个人等于一票或一票。尽管这种最初理解的精神仍然存在，但民主现在被认为是一个更为复杂的概念，它代表了诸如系统，国家，控制机制以及一系列原则和实践之类的多种要素。任何现代字典对单词的定义都可以使它变得明显。例如，牛津词典（Oxford Dictionaries）将民主定义为“由全体人口或一个州的所有合格成员组成的政府体系，通常是通过民选代表进行的选举”，“由民主制度管理的国家”或“对民主制度的控制”。组织或团体的大多数成员”或“社会平等的惯例或原则”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Canadian journal of communication》 |2014年第1期|145-148|共4页
  • 作者

    Genevieve A. Bonin;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Communication at the University of Ottawa, Desmarais Building, 55 Laurier Avenue East, 11th Floor, Ottawa ON K1N 6N5;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号