• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of information and library science >At The Intersection Of Sexual Diversity Studies And Lis: Focus On Lgbtq, An Introduction
【24h】

At The Intersection Of Sexual Diversity Studies And Lis: Focus On Lgbtq, An Introduction

机译：在性多样性研究与Lis的交叉口：聚焦于Lgbtq，简介

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In Canada for the past two decades within the field of Library and Information Science we have given long-standing and more or less consistent attention to the ways in which sexual identity and sexual orientation have intersected with the study of information practices. Indeed, Canadian scholars have pioneered the study of the information needs and uses of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer people. Yet the first article to report on the information needs of adult lesbians, written by Janet Creelman and Roma Harris, was published only 18 years ago. Since then in Canada and beyond we have a slowly growing accumulation of studies that examine the information needs and information practices of people who claim lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer sexual identities and sexual orientations. Such studies include investigations of library use and non-use (e.g., Joyce and Schrader 1997; Stenback and Schrader 1999), the role of bookstores and other community sources of information (e.g., Rothbauer 2004), the role of human intermediaries (e.g., Curry 2005), the use of information resources and services including barriers to access to information (e.g., Whitt 1993), as well as to reading and readers (e.g., Pecoskie 2005). While much attention has been focused on LGBQ_users whose identities affect their needs for information and their modes of access to information, some research has emphasized the role of information systems, collection practices, and classification schemes in the provision of LGBQ_information (e.g., Boon and Howard 2004; Campbell 2000). Other important work has garnered visibility for LGBTQJiterature through the publication of booklists and bibliographies (e.g., Cart and Jenkins 2006). For detailed recent reviews of LIS research concerned with sexual identity and sexual orientation, see Rothbauer (2007) and Schrader and Wells (2004).
机译：在过去的二十年中，在加拿大的图书馆学和信息科学领域，我们对性认同和性取向与信息实践研究相交的方式给予了长期或几乎一致的关注。确实，加拿大学者开创了研究女同性恋，男同性恋，双性恋和同性恋者的信息需求和用途的方法。珍妮特·克里尔曼（Janet Creelman）和罗姆·哈里斯（Roma Harris）撰写的第一篇有关成年女同性恋者的信息需求的报告仅在18年前发表。从那以后，在加拿大及其他地区，我们积累了越来越多的研究，以研究声称拥有同性恋，双性恋和同性恋倾向和性取向的人的信息需求和信息实践。这些研究包括对图书馆使用和不使用的调查（例如Joyce和Schrader 1997； Stenback和Schrader 1999），书店和其他社区信息资源的作用（例如Rothbauer 2004），人类中介的作用（例如， Curry 2005），信息资源和服务的使用，包括获取信息的障碍（例如Whitt 1993）以及阅读和读者的障碍（例如Pecoskie 2005）。尽管人们将注意力集中在身份对其信息需求和信息访问方式有影响的LGBQ_users上，但一些研究强调了信息系统，收集实践和分类方案在提供LGBQ_information方面的作用（例如，Boon和Howard 2004;坎贝尔2000）。通过出版书目和书目，其他重要工作也为LGBTQJererature赢得了知名度（例如Cart和Jenkins 2006）。有关LIS研究中有关性认同和性取向的详细近期评论，请参阅Rothbauer（2007）和Schrader and Wells（2004）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号