...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique >Reproducing Colonialism: Subject Formation and Talk Radio in English Canada
【24h】

Reproducing Colonialism: Subject Formation and Talk Radio in English Canada

机译：再现殖民主义：加拿大英语的主题形成和谈话广播

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

How is talk radio political? Much of the literature in political sciencenanswers this question through discussion of talk radio’s capacity to informnits listeners as to their political choices and by judging its content on thenbasis of whether or not it improves the listener’s capacity to make suchnchoices ~see Barker, 2002; Buckley, 2000; Dale and Naylor, 2005; Hart-nley, 2000; Page, 1996!. These approaches treat the listener as a pre-nformed subject, one that consumes information, deliberates and makesndecisions about ~political! problems, often citing the importance of thenmedia in Habermas’ concept of the public sphere ~Habermas, 1989!.Inntaking the listener as a pre-formed subject, these approaches ignore bothnthe importance of media in the formation of subjectivity and the politi-ncal nature of this subject formation ~as argued most famously by Fou-ncault!. In fact, the listener does not come to radio with his perspective,nviews, mindset, and conceptual vocabulary fully formed, awaiting thensonorous voice of authority to provide the last piece of information henneeds to determine whom to vote for. The act of listening constructs thenlistener, the listener’s mindset, perspective, his subjectivity. Those authorsnthat do focus on radio’s role in subject formation often use the opportu-nnity to criticize the invasion of the airwaves by shock jocks and inflam-nmatory hosts hailing from the conservative end of the political spectrum,narguing that the populism stirred by such radio works to underminendemocracy ~Gingras, 2007; Sampert, 2009!. Although these authors acceptnradio as a medium of interpellation, their studies ultimately function tonreinscribe the conception of radio as a means of disseminating information in a democracy. Very little scholarship on radio attempts to link thenexperience of the listener to the political process of subject formation.
机译：谈话广播的政治性如何？政治学上的许多文献都通过讨论谈话广播使听众了解他们的政治选择的能力以及根据其是否提高听众做出选择的能力来判断听众的能力来回答这个问题，参见Barker，2002； Buckley，2000年； Dale和Naylor，2005年； Hart-nley，2000年；页，1996！这些方法将听众视为预先形成的主题，它消耗信息，深思熟虑并做出关于政治的决策！这些问题，通常是在哈贝马斯（Habermas）的公共领域概念中提到媒体的重要性的，〜哈贝马斯（Habermas，1989）。把听众作为预先形成的主体，这些方法既忽略了媒体在主观性形成中的重要性，又忽略了政治性质。这个主题的形成〜正如傅康（Fou-ncault）最著名地论证！实际上，收听者并没有以完整的观点，观点，思维方式和概念性词汇来广播，而是等待着声音son的权威声音来提供最后的信息，以决定要投票给谁。聆听行为会建构出听者，聆听者的心态，观点，主观性。那些确实专注于无线电在主体形成中的作用的作者经常利用这种机会来批评电击骚扰和来自政治光谱保守派的炎性宿主入侵无线电波，认为这种无线电工作激起了民粹主义。降低民主程度〜金格拉斯，2007年；桑佩尔特，2009！尽管这些作者接受无线电作为交流的媒介，但他们的研究最终发挥作用，重新诠释了无线电的概念，认为无线电是在民主国家传播信息的一种手段。关于广播的学术研究很少尝试将听众的经验与主体形成的政治过程联系起来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号