• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Water News A propos de l'eau >Flood risk management in the Canadian prairie provinces: Defaulting towards flood resistance and recovery versus resilience
【24h】

Flood risk management in the Canadian prairie provinces: Defaulting towards flood resistance and recovery versus resilience

机译：加拿大草原省份的洪灾风险管理：防洪抗灾，恢复与抗灾能力默认设置

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Major flood events are likely to happen more frequently and be more severe under changing land use and climatic conditions. Adapting to floods using resilience-based flood risk management (FRM) policies and initiatives is a more appropriate solution than relying solely on flood defence structures or disaster recovery programmes. The primary authority for FRM in Canada is the provinces, but in practice, the policies and responsibilities are distributed across complex, multi-departmental, multi-scalar systems of government. To examine the extent to which institutional arrangements for FRM facilitate or constrain FRM resilience, this paper uses a case study of FRM policies, instruments and practices in the three Canadian prairie provinces where floods have been particularly severe in recent years. Document analysis provided insights into current FRM policies and instruments while semi-structured interviews with 34 individuals working in an FRM capacity informed the roles and responsibilities for FRM implementation. Results indicate that the current FRM policies and instruments across the prairie region have the basic requirements for flood resilience. However, flood resilience is inherently challenged by institutional fragmentation, lack of clarity of FRM roles and responsibilities, and policy layering and competing mandates, which biases FRM towards resistance and recovery solutions. To go beyond solely coordinating flood emergency response and recovery, the paper suggests an overarching regional or national FRM strategy and boundary organisation to coordinate roles and responsibilities for the specific purpose of flood resilience. This requires an agency with the mandate to manage FRM policy instruments, and clearly allocate decision authority amongst the multiple levels and layers of FRM governance.
机译：在不断变化的土地利用和气候条件下，重大洪灾事件可​​能会更频繁地发生并且更加严重。与仅依赖于防洪结构或灾难恢复计划相比，使用基于弹性的洪水风险管理（FRM）政策和计划来适应洪水是更合适的解决方案。在加拿大，FRM的主要权限是各省，但实际上，其政策和职责分布在复杂，多部门，多规模的政府体系中。为了考察FRM的体制安排在多大程度上促进或限制了FRM的复原力，本文以加拿大三个大草原省份的FRM政策，工具和实践为例，该省近年来洪灾特别严重。文件分析提供了对当前FRM政策和手段的见识，而对以FRM身份工作的34个人的半结构化访谈则告知了FRM实施的角色和责任。结果表明，整个草原地区当前的FRM政策和手段对防洪能力具有基本要求。但是，机构的分散性，FRM角色和职责的不明确以及政策的分层和相互竞争的任务，都使洪水的复原力受到了固有的挑战，这使FRM倾向于抵抗和恢复解决方案。为了超越仅协调洪水应急响应和恢复的范围，本文提出了一个总体的地区或国家FRM战略和边界组织，以针对洪水抗灾力的特定目的协调角色和责任。这要求授权机构负责管理FRM政策工具，并在FRM治理的多个层次和层次之间明确分配决策权限。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Water News A propos de l'eau》 |2018年第1期|33-46|共14页
  • 作者

    Morrison Alasdair; Noble Bram F.; Westbrook Cherie J.;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Geog & Planning, Saskatoon, SK, Canada;

    Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Geog & Planning, Saskatoon, SK, Canada;

    Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Geog & Planning, Saskatoon, SK, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号