首页> 外文期刊>Challenge >A Response to Caldwell on FA Hayek and The Road to Serfdom
【24h】

A Response to Caldwell on FA Hayek and The Road to Serfdom

机译:对FA Hayek和通向农奴制之路的考德威尔的回应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We are gratified that Bruce Caldwell, general editor of F. A. Hayek's Collected Works, has taken the time and trouble to reply to our article in the July/August issue of Challenge (Farrant and McPhail 2010a). Caldwell has a variety of objections to our evaluation of Hayek's message. In particular, he argues that we do not take sufficient heed of the historical and ideological backdrop against which Hayek initially wrote The Road to Serfdom. Caldwell also maintains that Hayek's ire in The Road to Serfdom is exclusively directed against wholesale command planning. Accordingly, he thinks that we misread Hayek's work when we argue that Hayek thought any dogged adherence to interventionist policy-the mixed economy and nascent welfare state-would ultimately mutate into wholesale central economic planning.
机译:我们感到高兴的是,F。A. Hayek的作品集总编辑Bruce Caldwell花费时间和精力来回复《挑战》(Farrant和McPhail,2010a)的7月/ 8月期中的文章。考德威尔(Caldwell)对我们对哈耶克(Hayek)信息的评价有多种异议。他特别指出,我们对哈耶克最初撰写的《通往农奴制之路》的历史和意识形态背景没有给予足够的重视。考德威尔还坚持认为,哈耶克在《通往农奴之路》中的愤怒完全是针对大规模指挥计划的。因此,他认为,当我们认为哈耶克认为任何顽固遵守干预主义政策(混合经济和新生福利国家)最终将转变为批发中央经济计划时,我们就误读了哈耶克的工作。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Challenge》 |2011年第1期|p.98-112|共15页
  • 作者

    Andrew Farrant; Edward McPhail;

  • 作者单位

    Dickinson College;

    Dickinson College;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号