...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cities >Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for Smart sustainable cities: What indicators and standards to use and when?
【24h】

Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for Smart sustainable cities: What indicators and standards to use and when?

机译：智能可持续城市标准化指标的比较分析：使用什么指标和标准？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

City managers need indicators for target setting, performance assessment, monitoring, management and decision-making purposes. The choice of the most suitable indicator framework is crucial, but difficult, as it requires expert knowledge. To help cities in their choice, this paper compares seven recently published indicator standards for Smart sustainable cities. A taxonomy was developed to evaluate each of their 413 indicators against five conceptual urban focuses (types of urban sustainability and smartness), ten sectoral application domains (energy, transport, ICT, economy, etc.) and five indicator types (input, process, output, outcome, impact). The results clearly discriminate between indicator standards suited for evaluating the implementation of predominantly smart city approaches versus standards more focused on sustainability assessment. A further distinction is possible in standards almost fully oriented towards impacts reached, and standards that allow for progress evaluation according to steps in the implementation process. Some standards provide a narrow focus on output indicators evaluating the progress in implementing smart urban ICT solutions (e.g. number of smart meters installed). Cities are encouraged to complement such evaluations with impact indicators that demonstrate the effects of those solutions. This paper provides guidance for city managers and policy makers to select the indicators and standard that best correspond to their assessment need and goals, and align with their stage in Smart sustainable city implementation.
机译：城市管理人员需要目标设定，绩效评估，监测，管理和决策目的指标。最合适的指标框架的选择是至关重要的，但困难，因为它需要专家知识。为了帮助您选择的城市，本文将最近发表的智能可持续城市的七项发表标准进行了比较。开发了分类法，以评估他们的413名指标，针对五个概念城市焦点（城市可持续性和智能性的类型），十个部门应用领域（能源，运输，ICT，经济等）和五种指标类型（输入，过程，产出，结果，影响）。结果明确区分了适合评估主要智能城市方法的指标标准与标准更关注可持续发展评估。在达到的攻击范围内的标准可能进一步区分，以及允许根据实施过程中的步骤进行进展评估的标准。一些标准在评估实施智能城市ICT解决方案的进展（例如安装的智能仪表数量）时，一些标准提供了狭隘的焦点。鼓励城市补充这种评价，这些评估表明这些解决方案的影响。本文为城市管理人员和决策者提供了最佳符合其评估需求和目标的指标和标准的指导，并与智能可持续城市实施方面对齐。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号