...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Citizenship Studies >Struggle for citizenship: interaction between political society and civil society at a Kurd refugee protest in Tokyo
【24h】

Struggle for citizenship: interaction between political society and civil society at a Kurd refugee protest in Tokyo

机译：争取公民身份：东京库尔德难民抗议活动中政治社会与公民社会的互动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article analyzes a Kurd refugee sit-in protest staged in front of the United Nations offices in Tokyo in July-September 2004 and its implications for the interaction between political society and civil society. The refugees' protest is viewed as a moment where the line between citizens and non-citizens is redrawn. Citizens possess an exclusive right to political speech and action. Protests by refugees undoubtedly question citizens' monopoly of this right. By organizing protests, refugees, who do not have citizenship status, raise their voices, make demands, and thus request a right to speech and action. In doing so, they blur the line between citizens and non-citizens. In this process, how do citizens and refugees interact with each other? By using Partha Chatterjee's concept of political society, I examine the different tactics employed by the refugees, who are part of political society, and the citizens of civil society. The case shows that when different voices meet, the voice of civil society drowns the voice of political society: the refugees' tactics were de-legitimized by the citizens. This interaction suggests that encounters between citizens and refugees are not simply events where the refugees claim a right to speech and action, but that such encounters also involve citizens in effect struggling to secure their monopoly of the same rights.
机译：本文分析了2004年7月至9月在联合国东京办事处前举行的库尔德难民静坐抗议，及其对政治社会与民间社会之间互动的影响。难民的抗议被视为重新划分公民与非公民之间界限的时刻。公民享有政治言论和行动的专有权利。难民的抗议无疑质疑公民对该权利的垄断。通过组织抗议活动，没有公民身份的难民提高了声音，提出要求，因此要求言论和行动权。这样做会模糊公民与非公民之间的界线。在这个过程中，公民和难民如何互动？通过使用帕特·查特吉（Partha Chatterjee）的政治社会概念，我研究了政治社会中的难民和公民社会所采用的不同策略。案例表明，当不同的声音相遇时，公民社会的声音淹没了政治社会的声音：难民的策略被公民剥夺了合法性。这种互动表明，公民与难民之间的相遇不仅仅是难民要求言论和行动权的事件，而且这种相遇也实际上牵涉到公民在努力争取自己对同一权利的垄断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号