...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>City >Can resilience be redeemed?: Resilience as a metaphor for change, not against change
【24h】

Can resilience be redeemed?: Resilience as a metaphor for change, not against change

机译：可以恢复弹性吗？：弹性是变革的隐喻，而不是反对变革的隐喻

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Resilience has been critiqued as being regressively status quo and thus propping up neo-liberalism, that it lacks transformative potential, and that it can be used as a pretence to cast off needy people and places. We move from this critique of resilience to a critical resilience, based in the following arguments: (ⅰ) resilience can sustain alternative and previous practices that contradict neo-liberalism; (ⅱ) resilience is more active and dynamic than passive; and (ⅲ) resilience can sustain survival, thus acting as a precursor to more obviously transformative action such as resistance. These bring us more closely to a heterogeneous de-neo-liberalized reading of resilience, explicitly opening it to social justice, power relations and uneven development, and performing valuable conceptual and pragmatic work that usefully moves us beyond resistance yet retaining (long-term) struggle.
机译：弹性被批评为是一种退步的现状，因此支撑着新自由主义，它缺乏变革的潜力，并且可以被当作一种伪装来驱逐有需要的人和地方。基于以下论点，我们从这种对弹性的批判转向了关键的弹性：（can）弹性可以维持与新自由主义相抵触的替代和先前做法； （ⅱ）应变能力比被动更具主动性和活力； （ⅲ）复原力可以维持生存，因此是诸如抵抗之类的更明显的变革性行动的先驱。这些使我们更接近于异质的，非新自由主义的复原力解读，明确地将其开放给社会正义，权力关系和不均衡的发展，并进行了有价值的概念和务实工作，有益地使我们摆脱了阻力，但保持了（长期）斗争。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号