...
首页> 外文期刊>Civil Engineering Surveyor >Anti-oral variation clauses
【24h】

Anti-oral variation clauses

机译:反口头变异条款

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

IN June 2001, a contract was signed between a company that makes electric motors and a company that uses motors as part of power steering systems in cars. The contract concerned the exclusive supply by one to the other of certain motors and associated items that were identified therein. About 13 years later, the purchaser (TRW Lucas) found itself on the wrong end of a €10m High Court judgment.1 TRW Lucas had, since about 2005, been buying motors from a third party, and HHJ Mackie QC found that this constituted a breach of the contract, even though the motors bought from the third party were not the same as the ones identified in the contract.
机译:2001年6月,一家制造电动机的公司与一家将电动机用作汽车动力转向系统的公司签订了合同。合同涉及一个人向另一个人独家供应其中确定的某些电动机和相关物品。大约13年后,购买者(TRW卢卡斯)发现自己处于高等法院1000万欧元判决的错误结局。1TRW卢卡斯自2005年以来一直在从第三方购买发动机,HHJ Mackie QC发现这构成了即使从第三方购买的电动机与合同中确定的电动机也不相同,但仍违反合同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号