...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Civil Engineering Surveyor >Valuing disruption
【24h】

Valuing disruption

机译：重视破坏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Disruption is often spoken about as if it is something that is well recognised, even self-evident. However, attempts may be made to identify it without success, or it may be in plain view but not recognised, like Lewis Carroll's Snark. In order to value disruption, it must be measured and priced. Overall, this is generally regarded as a difficult and imprecise exercise, although it need not be if satisfactory records exist. There is no good reason why satisfactory records should not be kept on either building or civil engineering projects, but there will be a fundamental difference between the valuations. Valuations for the building or process engineering project will generally be based on manpower, while that for the civil engineering works -will generally be based on machinery use and output. Also, a valuation of civil engineering disruption will be encumbered with different complexities than a building works disruption assessment.
机译：人们经常谈论破坏，就好像它是公认的东西，甚至是不言而喻的。但是，可能会尝试识别它而没有成功，或者它可能像Lewis Lewis Carroll的Snark一样被清晰地看到但未被识别。为了评估中断，必须对其进行衡量和定价。总体而言，这通常被认为是一项困难而又不精确的工作，尽管如果存在令人满意的记录就不必这样。没有充分的理由说明为什么不应在建筑或土木工程项目上保留令人满意的记录，但是估价之间会有根本性的区别。建筑或过程工程项目的评估通常基于人力，而土木工程项目的评估通常基于机械的使用和产出。此外，与建筑工程中断评估相比，土木工程中断的评估将具有不同的复杂性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号