...
【24h】

Don't go changing...

机译:不要改变...

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I must admit that I hadn't realised how popular Billy Joel's late 1970s hit 'Just the Way You Are' still is amongst the construction profession, on the subject of contracts. Clearly, once a song wins a Grammy its message remains valid for all time. Despite that misunderstanding, I have always been acutely aware that nobody likes lawyers 'over-lawyering' situations and making them more complicated than strictly necessary. However, having said that, is change always a bad thing? Is it really the case that the industry standard contracts (Joint Contracts Tribunal, New Engineering Contract, Infrastructure Conditions of Contract etc) are all perfect just the way they are?
机译:我必须承认,我还没有意识到比利·乔尔(Billy Joel)在1970年代后期打出的“ Just Way You Are”在合同方面仍然很受建筑业欢迎。显然,一首歌赢得格莱美奖后,其信息在所有时间内一直有效。尽管存在这种误解,但我始终敏锐地意识到,没有人喜欢律师“过度律师化”的情况,并使情况变得比绝对必要的更为复杂。但是,话虽这么说,改变总是一件坏事吗?业界标准合同(联合合同法庭,新工程合同,合同的基础设施条件等)是否真的完美无缺?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号