...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Civil Engineering >Design/Builder Mistakenly Relies on Owner's Preliminary Design
【24h】

Design/Builder Mistakenly Relies on Owner's Preliminary Design

机译：设计者/建造者错误地依赖所有者的初步设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

One of the many benefits of design/build for owners is that there is a single point of responsibility, the design/builder absorbing the legal risks for design defects. In a "bridged" procurement process, however, owners will develop an initial or partial design, use that design in the bid package, and ask prospective bidders to submit proposals to complete the design and construct the project. In this context the question arises whether the risk for design defects should then shift back to the owner. Most of the reported cases addressing this issue have come down in favor of the design/builder, holding that the owner should bear the risk of defects in its own bid documents. In this month's case, however, the design/ builder was unsuccessful in arguing that the owner should be liable for errors and ambiguities in the solicitation drawings.
机译：对所有者而言，设计/建造的众多好处之一是，责任单一，设计/建造者承担了设计缺陷的法律风险。但是，在“桥接”采购过程中，所有者将开发初始或部分设计，在投标包中使用该设计，并要求准投标人提交提案以完成设计和构建项目。在这种情况下，就会产生一个问题，即设计缺陷的风险是否应再转移给所有者。报告的大多数解决此问题的案例都对设计者/建造者有利，认为所有者应承担其自身投标文件中存在缺陷的风险。然而，在本月的案例中，设计/建造者未能成功地主张所有人应对招标书中的错误和歧义负责。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号