首页> 外文期刊>Wastes Management >Insights on incineration
【24h】

Insights on incineration

机译:焚化见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

At the beginning of April, John Grogan MP proposed a Westminster Hall debate on the regulation of incineration of waste - or energy from waste (EfW) as it is referred to more commonly. He put forward three proposals: introduce a moratorium on EfW; enforce the waste hierarchy properly; and seriously consider an incineration tax. On the first point, Grogan claimed that 'we have quite enough incinerators to deal with residual waste at the moment'. The UK is, in fact, experiencing a significant under-capacity of EfW, which is why we landfill approximately 12Mt of household and commercial waste, and send around 3.5Mt of residual waste for treatment overseas. There is a question about how much capacity we will need going forward. At the end of 2017, ESA commissioned Tolvik Consulting to synthesise different estimates and it found that, even if we meet 65 per cent recycling, there is still a risk of under-capacity - and we will still be heavily reliant on exports. So introducing a moratorium on EfW would risk a residual waste-treatment crisis that would result in having to open new landfills.
机译:4月初,国会议员约翰·格罗根(John Grogan)议员在威斯敏斯特大厦(Westminster Hall)上辩论了关于焚化废物-或更常见的废物能源(EfW)的法规。他提出了三点建议:暂停EfW;适当执行废物等级制度;并认真考虑焚化税。在第一点上,格罗根声称“目前我们有足够的焚化炉处理残余废物”。实际上,英国的EfW容量严重不足,这就是为什么我们要掩埋大约12吨家庭和商业垃圾,并将约3.5吨残余废物运往海外进行处理的原因。有一个关于我们将需要多少容量的问题。 2017年底,欧空局委托托尔维克咨询公司(Tolvik Consulting)对不同的估算进行综合,结果发现,即使我们达到65%的回收率,仍然存在产能不足的风险-我们仍将严重依赖出口。因此,暂停实施EfW可能会带来残余废物处理危机,这将导致不得不开设新的垃圾填埋场。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Wastes Management》 |2019年第3期|45-45|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号