【24h】

Centre stage

机译:实习中心

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In a word, yes. Given the lack of readiness in both the public and private sectors, the immediate negative impact on the Scottish economy that would have resulted from the introduction of the ban in 2021 was too significant to ignore. There is no question that the ban, as part of a number of other measures designed to reduce the overall amount of waste -including the Deposit Return Scheme (DRS) and the food waste action plan - as well as removing it from landfill, is necessary from an environmental perspective. However, the delay to the ban will allow strategic plans to be finalised by local authorities and the commercial sector collaboratively, mapping where waste is produced with where alternative infrastructure - such as anaerobic digestion (AD) and energy from waste (EfW) - should be located within Scotland. The Cabinet Secretary's announcement suggested that there will be Scottish Government assistance with this process in advance of the ban.
机译:一言以蔽之。鉴于公共部门和私营部门都缺乏准备,因此2021年实施禁令会对苏格兰经济产生直接的负面影响,这一点太重要了,不容忽视。毫无疑问,作为其他旨在减少废物总量的其他措施的一部分,该禁令是必要的,包括存款退还计划(DRS)和食物浪费行动计划,以及将其从垃圾填埋场清除的措施。从环境角度来看。但是,禁令的推迟将使地方当局和商业部门最终敲定战略计划,绘制出产生废物的地点以及应采用替代基础设施的地方,例如厌氧消化(AD)和废物能源(EfW)。位于苏格兰。内阁秘书的公告暗示,在禁令实施之前,苏格兰政府将在此过程中提供援助。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Wastes Management》 |2019年第6期|59-60|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号