Experts talk the future Reflections on the Bonn Seminar of Governmental Experts, 16-17 May 2005: a view from Europe

Martin Weiss

首页> 外文期刊>Climate Policy >Experts talk the future Reflections on the Bonn Seminar of Governmental Experts, 16-17 May 2005: a view from Europe

【24h】

Experts talk the future Reflections on the Bonn Seminar of Governmental Experts, 16-17 May 2005: a view from Europe

机译：专家谈论未来在2005年5月16日至17日的政府专家波恩研讨会上的思考：欧洲的看法

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

When climate negotiators from all over the world gathered in Bonn in May, something different from regular meetings of the UNFCCC subsidiary bodies occurred. Instead of reiterating their well-known positions on long-standing agenda items and hiding behind the nitty-gritty of earlier agreements, government officials were invited to participate in an activity that is usually confined to the corridors of international conferences: an informal exchange of information. Were we in for a revolution in the style of international negotiations? Indeed, the secretariat and the two excellent co-chairs made every effort to create an informal atmosphere. The comfortable red armchairs on the stage were suggestive of a pleasant chat among friends around the fireplace.

机译：5月，来自世界各地的气候谈判代表聚集在波恩时，发生了与《气候公约》附属机构例行会议不同的事件。与其在长期议程项目上重申其众所周知的立场，而不是在较早达成的协议中隐藏细节，而是邀请政府官员参加通常限于国际会议走廊的活动：非正式信息交流。我们是否要进行国际谈判方式的革命？确实，秘书处和两位出色的共同主席竭尽全力营造一种非正式的气氛。舞台上舒适的红色扶手椅暗示壁炉旁的朋友愉快地聊天。

著录项

来源
《Climate Policy》 |2005年第2期|p.229-231|共3页
作者
Martin Weiss;
展开▼
作者单位

Federal Environmental Agency (UBA), Berlin, Germany;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类大气科学（气象学）;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. LOBBYING SEMINAR A SUCCESS: >Top government relations experts as speakers [J] . Claude Paul Boivin The Canadian veterinary journal . 2002,第1期

机译：游说研讨会的成功：>政府关系高级专家作为演讲人
2. Experts define future of Jewellery design at GJEPC seminar [J] . Minerals & Metals Review Weekly . 2016,第8期

机译：专家在GJEPC研讨会上定义珠宝设计的未来
3. VIDEO INTERVIEW: CYBERSECURITY EXPERT PETER CORONEOS TALKS TO TOP AUSTRALIA CYBER LEGAL AND REGULATORY EXPERT, PROF. PATRICK FAIR [J] . Alex Zaharov-Reutt Exchange . 2021,第Mara5期

机译：视频采访：网络安全专家Peter Coroneos与Top Australia Cyber法律和监管专家讨论。帕特里克博览会
4. "Green Supply Chain - European Expert views through a student seminar series" [C] . Torben Schaefer IFAC Workshop on International Stability, Technology, and Culture . 2013

机译：“绿色供应链 - 通过学生研讨会系列欧洲专家景观”
5. Through Thick and Thin: Americans’ Trust in Dietary Experts (1945-2005) [D] . Weisse, Travis A. 2020

机译：通过厚实和薄：美国人对饮食专家的信任（1945-2005）
6. Experts Talking to Non-experts [O] . M. J. Chamberlain 1971

机译：专家与非专家交谈
7. Pyramidal groups, in Italy and elsewhere, represent a model of separation of ownership and control. Pyramids typically have blockholders which extract private benefits of control at the expenses of minority shareholder. This paper focuses on the Italian case where the number of pyramids is reducing but are still largely diffused. Groups are a form of entrenchment and may have negative effects on firm growth. They are characterized by conflicts of interest and self-dealing practices which reduced external financing opportunities. In this paper legal regulation of groups in Italy is discussed, which has positive aspects (art. 2497 ss. c.c.) but some weaknesses on self-dealing practices (artt. 2391 and 2391-bis c.c.). Future reforms should take into consideration the guidelines given at European level (for instance, by the High Level Group of Company Law Experts and the European Commission), which have been set aside from the political agendas of mostly European governments. Moreover, we suggest to strengthen the process of (not only formal) disclosure of relevant information to the company shareholders’ as well, in order not to dismantle pyramids, but to make them “shorter” (when that is the case), more transparent and reciprocally competitive. [O] . Giacomo Bosi, Sandro Trento 100

机译：在意大利和其他地方的金字塔群体代表了所有权和控制权分离的模式。金字塔通常拥有大股东，以小股东的利益为代价提取控制权的私人利益。本文重点关注意大利案例，其中金字塔的数量在减少，但仍然在很大程度上分散。群体是一种壕沟形式，可能对企业的成长产生负面影响。它们的特点是利益冲突和自我交易做法，减少了外部融资机会。在本文中，讨论了意大利群体的法律规定，它具有积极的方面（第2497条，c.c。），但在自我交易实践方面存在一些弱点（第2391条和第2391条之二）。未来的改革应该考虑到欧洲层面的指导方针（例如，公司法专家和欧洲委员会的高级别小组），这些指导方针已被搁置在主要是欧洲政府的政治议程之外。此外，我们建议加强（不仅正式）向公司股东披露相关信息的过程，以便不拆除金字塔，而是使它们“更短”（在这种情况下），更透明并且相互竞争。

Experts talk the future Reflections on the Bonn Seminar of Governmental Experts, 16-17 May 2005: a view from Europe

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅