首页> 外文期刊>Clinical governance >Policy dialogues: facilitators' perceived role and influence
【24h】

Policy dialogues: facilitators' perceived role and influence

机译:政策对话:促进者的作用和影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to better understand facilitators' perceived role and influence on a policy dialogue's (PD) process and impact. PDs enable interactions between policy makers, researchers and other stakeholders - one of the factors associated with promoting evidence-informed policy making. Design/methodology/approach - This is an exploratory study based on semi-structured interviews with ten key informants from sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, North and South America. Participants were purposefully sampled based on their experience in facilitating or observing PDs organi2ed by the WHO's Evidence-informed Policy Network. Data were analyzed using a constant comparative method. Findings - A successful PD relies on a structured process used to catalyze impact. Facilitators contribute to a successful PD through their facilitation skills, for example, helping to get to an informed judgment; knowledge, for example, about the health system; attitudes, for example, valuing the PD process over its outcomes; and personal attributes, for example, credibility. Facilitators' involvement in preparatory and follow-up actions are equally paramount for a PD's success. Challenges in implementing PDs can be prevented/attenuated, for example, through stakeholder analysis to identify suitable PD participants, and anticipate power constellations or potential conflicts. Research limitations/implications - Research should focus on the overall process of a PD - especially on preparation and follow-up activities and their influence on a PD's success. Originality/value - Informed by harnessing practical experiences, this paper outlines facilitators' skills, attributes, attitudes, knowledge and how these can be used to influence a PD's success.
机译:目的-本文的目的是更好地理解主持人对政策对话(PD)流程和影响的感知角色和影响。效绩数据可促进决策者,研究人员和其他利益相关者之间的互动,这是与促进循证决策有关的因素之一。设计/方法/方法-这是一项探索性研究,是基于对来自撒哈拉以南非洲,中东,北美洲和南美洲的十位主要信息提供者进行的半结构化访谈的基础上进行的。根据参与者在促进或遵守世卫组织循证政策网络组织的效绩数据方面的经验,对其进行了有目的的抽样。使用恒定比较方法分析数据。调查结果-成功的PD依赖于用于促进影响的结构化过程。主持人通过其主持技能为成功的PD做出贡献,例如,帮助做出明智的判断;例如关于卫生系统的知识;例如,对效绩数据过程对其结果进行评估的态度;和个人属性,例如信誉。促进者参与准备和后续行动对于PD的成功同样重要。例如,可以通过利益相关者分析来识别/确定合适的PD参与者,并预测电源群或潜在冲突,来预防/缓解实施PD中的挑战。研究的局限性/含义-研究应关注PD的整个过程-尤其是准备和后续活动及其对PD成功的影响。原创性/价值-通过利用实践经验,本文概述了调解人的技能,特质,态度,知识以及如何将其用于影响PD的成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号