• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Cognitive Behaviour Therapy >Establishing Guidelines for Executing and Reporting Internet Intervention Research
【24h】

Establishing Guidelines for Executing and Reporting Internet Intervention Research

机译：建立执行和报告互联网干预研究的指南

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The field of Internet interventions is growing rapidly. New programs are continually being developed to facilitate health and mental health promotion, disease and emotional distress prevention, risk factor management, treatment, and relapse prevention. However, a clear definition of Internet interventions, guidelines for research, and evidence of effectiveness have been slower to follow. This article focuses on the quality standardization of research on Internet-delivered psychological and behavioural interventions. Although the science underpinning Internet interventions is just starting to be established, across research studies there are often conceptual and methodological difficulties. The authors argue that this situation is due to the lack of universally accepted operational guidelines and evaluation methods. Following a critical appraisal of existing codes of conduct and guidelines for Internet-assisted psychological and health interventions, the authors developed a framework of guidelines for Internet intervention research utilizing aspects of facet theory (Guttman & Greenbaum, 1998). The framework of facets, elements, and guidelines of best practice in reporting Internet intervention research was then sent to several leading researchers in the field for their comment and input, so that a consensus framework could be agreed on. The authors outline 12 key facets to be considered when evaluating and reporting Internet intervention studies. Each facet consists of a range of recommended elements, designed as the minimum features for reporting Internet intervention studies. The authors propose that this framework be utilized when designing and reporting Internet intervention research, so results across studies can be replicated, extended, compared, and contrasted with greater ease and clarity.View full textDownload full textKeywordsInternet interventions, research, evaluation, guidelines, reporting criteriaRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2011.573807
机译：互联网干预领域正在迅速发展。不断开发新的计划，以促进健康和心理健康，预防疾病和情绪困扰，风险因素管理，治疗和预防复发。但是，互联网干预的明确定义，研究指南以及有效性证据的追踪速度较慢。本文重点关注互联网提供的心理和行为干预研究的质量标准化。尽管支撑互联网干预的科学才刚刚开始建立，但是在研究中，通常存在概念和方法上的困难。作者认为，这种情况是由于缺乏普遍接受的操作指南和评估方法所致。在对现有的行为准则和互联网辅助的心理和健康干预措施的指导方针进行严格的评估之后，作者利用方面理论开发了互联网干预研究的指导框架（Guttman＆Greenbaum，1998）。然后，将报告互联网干预研究的最佳实践方面，要素和指南的框架发送给该领域的几位领先研究人员，以征求他们的意见和建议，以便可以达成共识框架。作者概述了评估和报告Internet干预研究时要考虑的12个关键方面。每个方面都包含一系列推荐要素，这些要素被设计为报告Internet干预研究的最低功能。作者建议在设计和报告Internet干预研究时使用此框架，以便可以更轻松，更清晰地复制，扩展，比较和对比研究的结果。查看全文下载全文关键词Internet干预，研究，评估，指南，报告条件相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布号：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2011.573807

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号