...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy >When the Fast Track Hits the Off Ramp: Renewable Energy Permitting and Legal Resistance on Western Public Lands
【24h】

When the Fast Track Hits the Off Ramp: Renewable Energy Permitting and Legal Resistance on Western Public Lands

机译：当快车道驶入坡道时：西方公共土地上的可再生能源许可和法律抵制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In considering each of these alternatives, it may be effective for BLM managers to think about what they want from an approval process. While it is tempting to approve the most projects in the least amount of time, and to show progress towards national energy goals, BLM might not want to concentrate all of its efforts on fast-tracking if doing so results in lawsuits, acrimony, and opposition. At the same time, slowing down the process to a crawl is unlikely to win BLM support from funders, who will see a process that was once approving projects at a fast rate and question why they are unable to continue installing projects at that rate. So, the preferred alternative for BLM may be to continue attempting to fast-track renewable energy projects, but to do so in such a way that local concerns are more explicitly addressed during each stage of the process. In other words, a simple assessment may not be sufficient; it may be that citizen groups should be consulted before zoning and other geographical decisions are made. This should occur during stages in which developers submit proposals for new energy projects as well as during and after project installation and implementation. Although this might incur greater financial costs for BLM, such mechanisms also could occur parallel with other parts of the process and thus not slow down the time frame of the overall process. In fact, if they were to reduce the number of lawsuits from groups now included in the process, such mechanisms could decrease the time from project conceptualization to energy production, and perhaps enable BLM to obtain more funding, devote more resources to renewable energy projects, and help to meet national energy goals.
机译：在考虑这些替代方案时，对于BLM经理来说，考虑他们在批准过程中的要求可能是有效的。虽然BLM试图在最短的时间内批准最多的项目，并显示朝着实现国家能源目标的进展，但BLM可能不希望将所有精力都集中在快速通道上，如果这样做会导致诉讼，激烈的争执和反对。 。同时，将流程放慢到缓慢的过程不太可能获得资助者的BLM支持，他们将看到一个流程曾经以快速的速度批准项目，并质疑为什么他们无法继续以这种速度安装项目。因此，BLM的首选替代方案可能是继续尝试快速跟踪可再生能源项目，但这样做的方式是在流程的每个阶段都可以更明确地解决本地问题。换句话说，简单的评估可能还不够。在进行分区和其他地理决策之前，可能应咨询公民团体。这应该发生在开发人员为新能源项目提交提案的阶段，以及项目安装和实施期间和之后的阶段。尽管这可能会给BLM带来更大的财务成本，但这种机制也可能与流程的其他部分并行发生，因此不会减慢整个流程的时间范围。实际上，如果他们要减少流程中现在涉及的群体的诉讼数量，那么这种机制可以减少从项目概念化到能源生产的时间，也许可以使BLM获得更多资金，将更多资源投入可再生能源项目，并帮助实现国家能源目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号