• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Communication Law and Policy >The Right to Privacy Revisited: Privacy, News, and Social Change, 1890-1990
【24h】

The Right to Privacy Revisited: Privacy, News, and Social Change, 1890-1990

机译：隐私权重新审视：隐私，新闻和社会变迁，1890-1990

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Scholarship often traces American privacy law to Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis's influential 1890 Harvard Law Review article. The Warren and Brandeis article argues judges ought to protect a person's thoughts, sensations and emotions against invasions by the press, photographers, distributors of portraits, and publishers of gossip. Warren and Brandeis connected the right of privacy to personal dignity and what Judge Thomas M. Cooley identified as a "right to be let alone." Just over a century later, Professor Randall P. Bezanson revisited their article. He explained Warren and Brandeis's conception of privacy was a response to nineteenth century social conditions and cultural values that were distinct from twentieth century social conditions and cultural values. Bezanson's article demonstrates a legal concept can be better understood by exploring social and cultural history to analyze what a particular law was intended to protect.
机译：奖学金经常将美国隐私法追溯到Samuel D. Warren和Louis D. Brandeis的有影响力的1890年哈佛法审查文章。沃伦和布兰迪斯文章认为法官应该保护一个人的思想，感觉和情绪，以防止博览会，摄影师，肖像的分销商和八卦的出版商的侵犯。沃伦和布兰迪斯将隐私权与个人尊严联系起来，托马斯M. Cooley判定为“孤独的权利”。刚刚超过一个世纪之后，Randall P. Bezanson教授重新审视了他们的文章。他解释了沃伦，Brandeis对隐私的概念是对十九世纪的社会条件和文化价值观的回应，这些价值与二十世纪社会条件和文化价值不同。 Bezanson的文章展示了通过探索社会和文化史来分析特定法律旨在保护的法律概念，可以更好地了解法律概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号