...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Communication Law and Policy >TOWN HALL MEETINGS WITHOUT THE TOWN: WERE THE DENVER THREE'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS VIOLATED?
【24h】

TOWN HALL MEETINGS WITHOUT THE TOWN: WERE THE DENVER THREE'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS VIOLATED?

机译：没有城镇的市政厅会议：是否违反了丹佛市的第一修正案权利？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

On March 21, 2005, three Denver residents were removed from a town-hall style meeting where President George W. Bush discussed his administration's plans for Social Security reform. According to initial reports, the residents were identified and removed because of a bumper sticker visible on the car they drove to the event which stated "No More Blood for Oil." The incident raises dual questions of whether the individuals responsible for the trio's removal can be considered "state actors" for purposes of analyzing a constitutional claim on their behalf and whether, even if state action is present, the removal violated their First Amendment rights. This article concludes that a case can be made for both the presence of state action and a First Amendment violation.
机译：2005年3月21日，三名丹佛居民被从市政厅式的会议中撤职，乔治·W·布什总统在会上讨论了他的政府的社会保障改革计划。根据最初的报告，居民被发现并被驱逐出境是因为他们驾驶的汽车上有一个保险杠贴纸，上面写着“不要再用油换油了”。该事件引起了双重问题，即负责三人被遣散的个人是否可以被视为“国家行为者”，以便代表他们分析宪法主张，以及即使采取了国家行动，遣散也是否违反了他们的第一修正案权利。本文的结论是，既可以针对国家行为的存在，也可以针对违反第一修正案的情况提出理由。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号