...
首页> 外文期刊>Communication Quarterly >'They’re always wrong anyway': exploring differences of credibility, attraction, and behavioral intentions in professional, amateur, and robotic-delivered weather forecasts
【24h】

'They’re always wrong anyway': exploring differences of credibility, attraction, and behavioral intentions in professional, amateur, and robotic-delivered weather forecasts

机译:“无论如何,他们总是错了':探索专业,业余和机器人交付的天气预报的可信度,吸引力和行为意图的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Weather-related communication lends itself well to various styles ofdelivery and medium. Yet, new communication technologies havechanged information consumption in this domain and createdchanges for broadcast media. Some new media platforms allowthe participation of nonprofessional (amateur) agents, whereasothers, such as social robotics or chatbots, allow for the removalof a human-element entirely. As these platforms further proliferatein society, it is vital to understand individuals’ perceptions aboutboth the content and the medium, especially in messages whichcan ultimately remove an individual from danger such as thoseabout weather risks. This experimental study examines differenceswhen individuals view a video/broadcast weather forecast deliveredby a professional, an amateur, or a social robot. Results suggestthat individuals find professional meteorologists significantly morecredible than amateur or robotic counterparts.
机译:与天气有关的通信对各种风格很好交付和中等。然而,新的通信技术有更改了此域中的信息消耗并创建了广播媒体的变化。一些新的媒体平台允许非专业(业余)代理人的参与,而其他人,如社会机器人或聊天栏,允许删除完全是人类元素。随着这些平台进一步增殖在社会中,了解个人的看法至关重要内容和介质,尤其是在消息中最终可以从诸如那些等危险中删除个人关于天气风险。该实验研究检查了差异当个人查看视频/广播天气预报时由专业,业余爱好者或社会机器人。结果表明该个人在很大程度上找到专业的气象学家比业余或机器人对应物可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号