...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Communication research >From Persuasion to Deliberation: Do Experiences of Online Political Persuasion Facilitate Dialogic Openness?
【24h】

From Persuasion to Deliberation: Do Experiences of Online Political Persuasion Facilitate Dialogic Openness?

机译：从劝说到审议：在线政治劝说的经验促进对话的开放性吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Research has long considered the role interpersonal persuasion plays in shaping how citizens form their political opinions and cast their votes. Yet few studies have examined how experiences with online persuasion might influence broader deliberative orientations. We propose the “Persuasion-Openness” model, in which both attempting and being the target of online political persuasion encourage individuals to engage in online cross-cutting discussion with those who hold differing political views. These more deliberative exchanges are in turn associated with increased “dialogic openness”—a broader orientation toward political dialog. We test this model using original panel survey data collected during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Findings show that both types of persuasion experiences can indirectly lead to dialogic openness, by stimulating online cross-cutting discussion. However, the mediated pathway for those targeted for online persuasion is only significant in online environments with low levels of attitude-challenging information.
机译：研究长期以来一直考虑了人际关系说明在塑造公民如何形成政治意见并投票中的作用。然而，近几季度研究已经审查了在线劝说的经验可能会影响更广泛的审议方向。我们提出了“劝说 - 开放”模型，其中试图和在线政治劝说的目标鼓励个人与那些持有不同政治观点的人进行在线交汇讨论。这些更加审议的交易所与增加的“对话开放” - 对政治对话的更广泛的定位相关。我们使用2016年美国总统大选期间收集的原始面板调查数据测试此模型。调查结果表明，通过刺激在线交叉讨论，两种类型的说服经验都可以间接导致对话的开放性。然而，针对在线劝说的人的介导的途径在在线环境中只有重要的态度具有挑战性信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号