• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Communication research >Does Training Improve the Detection of Deception? A Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Does Training Improve the Detection of Deception? A Meta-Analysis

机译：培训是否可以提高对欺骗的发现？荟萃分析

获取原文
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This meta-analysis examined whether training improves detection of deception. Overall, 30 studies (22 published and 8 unpublished; control-group design) resulted in a small to medium training effect for detection accuracy (k = 30, g(u) = 0.331) and for lie accuracy (k = 11, g(u) = 0.422), but not for truth accuracy (k = 11, g(u) = 0.060). If participants were guided by cues to detect the truth, rather than to detect deception, only truth accuracy was increased. Moderator analyses revealed larger training effects if the training was based on verbal content cues, whereas feedback, nonverbal and paraverbal, or multichannel cue training had only small effects. Type of training, duration, mode of instruction, and publication status were also important moderators. Recommendations for designing, conducting, and reporting training studies are discussed.
机译：这项荟萃分析检查了培训是否可以改善欺骗的检测。总体而言，有30项研究（22篇已发表和8篇未发表；对照组设计）对检测准确度（k = 30，g（u）= 0.331）和测谎准确性（k = 11，g（ u）= 0.422），但不是为了保证真相准确性（k = 11，g（u）= 0.060）。如果参与者被提示引导以检测真相，而不是检测欺骗，则只会提高真相的准确性。主持人的分析显示，如果训练是基于言语内容提示的，则训练效果更好，而反馈，非语言和副词或多通道提示训练的效果很小。培训类型，持续时间，教学模式和出版状态也是重要的主持人。讨论了有关设计，进行和报告培训研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号