...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Communication Theory >From Mad Scientist to Bad Scientist: Richard Seed as Biogovernmental Event
【24h】

From Mad Scientist to Bad Scientist: Richard Seed as Biogovernmental Event

机译：从疯狂科学家到不良科学家：理查德·塞德（Richard Seed）担任生物政府活动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In 1998, Chicago physicist Richard Seed's announcement that he would clone a human being set off an international media furor that revealed important insights into our understandings of biotechnology, scientists, and governmental regulation of genetic research. This study examines English-language media coverage of Seed over a 5-year period, tracing how his initial framing as a "mad scientist" was quickly contained and managed by the scientific community through his reframing as a "bad scientist." Amid media calls for a response from government regulators, it became apparent that the state has failed to adequately prepare itself and the public for the eventuality of human cloning, a failure of biogovernance. This article discusses how three tensions in current biogovernmental practice were made visible once Seed was read as a biogovernmental event.
机译：1998年，芝加哥物理学家理查德·塞德（Richard Seed）宣布，他将克隆一个人，这引起了国际媒体的热烈讨论，该报道揭示了我们对生物技术，科学家和政府对基因研究的了解的重要见解。这项研究调查了英语媒体在5年内对“种子”的报道，以追踪他最初作为“疯狂科学家”的构架是如何通过重新定义为“坏科学家”而被科学界迅速遏制和管理的。在媒体呼吁政府监管机构做出回应的过程中，很明显，该州未能为人类克隆的最终结果（生物治理的失败）充分做好自身和公众的准备。本文讨论了一旦将Seed视为一项生物政府活动，就如何使当前生物政府实践中的三种张力变得可见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号