• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Communications >Repercussion and resistance: An empirical study on the interrelation between science and mass media
【24h】

Repercussion and resistance: An empirical study on the interrelation between science and mass media

机译：冲击与阻力：科学与大众传媒相互关系的实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The article employs the mediatization concept to analyze the relationship of science and the mass media. It draws on theoretical considerations from the sociology of science to distinguish and empirically investigate two dimensions of mediatization: changes in media coverage of science on the one hand and the repercussions of this coverage on science on the other hand. Results of content analyses and focused expert interviews show that mediatization phenomena can indeed be observed in the case of science, but they are limited to certain disciplines, to certain phases (mediatization phases differ from routine phases in which the media tend to acknowledge scientific criteria, routines, and knowledge), and to a small number of media visible scientists. We conclude that media-induced structural change in science, though present, is less pronounced than mediatization of other parts of society. Compared to spheres such as politics and sports, science's media resistance is rather high.
机译：本文采用中介化的概念来分析科学与大众传媒的关系。它借鉴了科学社会学的理论考虑，以区分和实证研究媒介化的两个方面：一方面是媒体对科学报道的变化，另一方面是这种媒体报道对科学的影响。内容分析和有针对性的专家访谈的结果表明，在科学领域确实可以观察到中介现象，但它们仅限于某些学科，某些阶段（中介阶段不同于常规阶段，在常规阶段中，媒体倾向于承认科学标准，常规和知识），以及少数媒体可以看到的科学家。我们得出的结论是，媒介引起的科学结构变化（尽管存在）没有社会其他部分的中介作用明显。与政治和体育等领域相比，科学对媒体的抵抗力很高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号