...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The computer & internet lawyer >When Smart Contracts Break: Developments in Blockchain, Smart Contracts, and Online Dispute Resolution
【24h】

When Smart Contracts Break: Developments in Blockchain, Smart Contracts, and Online Dispute Resolution

机译：当智能合约破裂时：区块链，智能合约和在线争议解决的发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

When people think of the legal issues around block-chain technology in 2019, their thoughts probably jump to initial coin or security token offering regulations. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC),and numerous state securities regulators recently have taken steps to rein in questionable offerings. The prospect of traversing the still-developing maze of SEC, CFTC, and state regulatory requirements rightly keeps many block-chain founders and their potential investors up at night. Perhaps thoughts turn next to the non-trivial task of patenting blockchain technologies. Although some in the industry perceive patents as antithetical to open-source principles underpinning blockchain technology, most recognize that patents are often the most cost-effective path for allowing fledgling technology companies to protect their innovations and attract institutional investors. Considering these pressing issues, contract law may not be on the radar. But it should be.
机译：当人们想到2019年有关区块链技术的法律问题时，他们的想法可能会跳到最初的代币或安全令牌提供法规。证券交易委员会（SEC），商品期货交易委员会（CFTC）和许多州证券监管机构最近已采取措施来控制有问题的发行。穿越SEC，CFTC和国家监管要求仍在发展的迷宫的前景正确地使许多区块链创始人及其潜在投资者在夜间陷入困境。也许想法会转向为区块链技术申请专利的艰巨任务。尽管业内一些人认为专利与支撑区块链技术的开源原则背道而驰，但大多数人认识到专利通常是允许新兴技术公司保护其创新并吸引机构投资者的最经济有效的途径。考虑到这些紧迫的问题，合同法可能不会受到关注。但这应该是。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号